Table 4.
The different reported means of cochlear parameters values in the various studies that are done based on the radiological method in measurement including our current study.
| Author | Year | N | A (mm) | B (mm) | H (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escudé et al2 | 2006 | 84 | 9.23 | 6.9 | N/A |
| Martinez-Monedero et al16 | 2011 | 124 | 8.39 | 6.98 | N/A |
| Van der Marel et al17 | 2014 | 671 | 8.85 | 6.58 | N/A |
| Avci et al10 | 2014 | 16 | 9.2 | 7.0 | 4.4 |
| Pelliccia et al18 | 2014 | 482 | 9 | 6.8 | N/A |
| Meng J et al21 | 2016 | 178 men | 9.12 | 6.41 | N/A |
| 132 women | 8.93 | 6.22 | |||
| Liu et al19 | 2017 | 204 | 8.84 ± 0.29 | 6.30 ± 0.38 | 3.59 ± 0.12 |
| Rivas et al20 | 2017 | 309 | 9.22 ± 0.44 | N/A | |
| This study | 2019 | 88 | DICOM viewer 8.43 | N/A | N/A |
| OTOPLAN 8.44 | 6.53 | 2.71 |