Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;13(5):1017–1023.

Table 2.

Univariate Cox regression analyses of clinicopathologic factors in the prognosis of gastric cancer

Factor Univariate analyses

HR 95% CI P value
Gender (Male vs. Female) 1.14 0.64-1.59 0.771
Age (<50 vs. ≥50) 1.58 0.86-2.17 0.423
Tumor size (<5 vs. ≥5) 0.75 0.30-1.48 0.534
Tumor location (Distal/middle vs. Proximal) 1.43 0.81-1.90 0.361
Differentiation (Well/moderate vs. Poor) 2.25 0.97-3.74 0.085
Borrmann type (I/II vs. III/IV) 0.69 0.32-1.35 0.912
CEA status (Negative vs. Positive) 1.07 0.64-1.61 0.783
Invasive depth (T1/T2 vs. T3/T4) 1.34 0.65-1.88 0.302
Distant metastasis (Negative vs. Positive) 4.73 2.49-7.53 <0.001*
TNM stage (I/II vs. III/IV) 4.08 2.11-6.62 <0.001*
Lymph node metastasis (Negative vs. Positive) 2.15 1.23-4.09 0.016*
Circ_0026344 level (low vs. high) 2.67 1.45-4.83 0.002*

HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

*

P<0.05.