Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2020 May 1;13(5):1275–1282.

Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue: a case report and review of the literature

Youjie Gong 1, Mengmeng Liu 1, Qiong Wu 1, Yuanyuan Liu 1, Jinlian Zhang 2, Lili Yao 2, Yurong Ou 1
PMCID: PMC7270675  PMID: 32509104

Abstract

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a soft tissue malignant tumor of unknown origin in which tissues or cells are arranged like acini or organs. It usually presents in the deep muscles or fascia of the extremities, and rarely occurs in the head and neck, let alone the tongue. To our knowledge, only 49 cases of ASPS have been previously published in the tongue. Therefore, the course, age of onset, tumor size, and prognosis of ASPS in the tongue are not well understood. We present a case of ASPS in the dorsum of left tongue of a 24-year-old female. Histology of the resected tumor showed features of ASPS. She is currently disease-free at 12-month follow-up.

Keywords: Alveolar soft part sarcoma, tongue, immunohistochemistry

Introduction

Alveolar soft part sarcoma, named by Christopherson in 1952, is a rare soft tissue sarcoma with unique morphologic characteristics. ASPS is a slow-growing, painless tumor and often found by accident. The incidence of ASPS accounts for only 0.5% to 1.0% of soft tissue sarcomas. It is less common in head and neck, accounting for less than 0.1% of head and neck sarcomas. In adults, it mainly occurs in the lower extremities. In infants and children, tumors are often located in the head and neck. Fewer cases occur in the head and neck in adults, and when the lesion appears in the head and neck, it is mainly located in the deep muscles of the neck and the deep surface of the pharyngeal cavity [1]. The current case is a 24-year-old female with ASPS in the dorsum of left tongue.

Case report

Clinical history

A 24-year-old female presented with a 1-year history of an asymptomatic slowly growing lesion of the dorsum of left tongue, and at the time, she did not seek any treatment. She complained the tumor had slightly enlarged recently. The local skin temperature of the tumor was not high, the surface was not ulcerated, and there was no obvious fluctuance and edema.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 2.5×2.5×2.0 cm mass originating from the left tongue (Figure 1). The lesion had a high signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images and a uniform enhancement after intravenous contrast material administration. No obvious enlarged lymph nodes were noted in the neck. Imaging studies, including computed tomography of the chest, MRI of the brain and oral, positron emission tomography (PET) showed no metastatic lesions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging findings. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating a focal 2.5×2.5×2.0 cm lesion within the tongue (arrow).

The patient underwent an extended resection of the left tongue tumor under general anesthesia. During the operation, it was seen that the middle part of the left tongue protruded across the midline of the tongue to the opposite side. The mucosa around the tumor was deformed, and the blood supply around the tumor was abundant. The mass was solid, grayish white. The tumor envelope was intact, and the boundary with the surrounding tissue was clear.

Materials and methods

The resected specimen was fixed in 10% neutral phosphate-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), before and after diastase digestion.

Pathologic findings

The pathology of the resected specimen shows characteristic features of alveolar soft part sarcoma. The tumor cells have the same morphology, showing large round or polygonal shape, abundant cytoplasm, eosinophilic, fine granular, large nucleus, vacuole-like, obvious nucleoli, and obvious lack of adhesion between cells, forming acinar-like structures (Figure 2A). The tumor cell cytoplasm contains PAS-positive amylase-resistant substances (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Histologic features of the tumor. A. Tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli. B. Tumor cells cytoplasm contains PAS-positive amylase-resistant substances.

Immunohistochemical results show strong nuclear immune response to TFE-3 (Figure 3A), MyoD1 (Figure 3B) is focally positive and the tumor cells are diffusely positive for SMA (Figure 3C), Vimentin (Figure 3D). There is no immunoreactivity for CK, Desmin, S-100, EMA, Syn, HMB-45, Melan A. Later, the patient went to two higher-level hospitals for pathologic section consultation and they performed FISH detection. The results were positive for t (Xp11.2) (TFE-3), that is, TFE-3 gene-related translocation. The patient has remained in good health and is disease-free 12-months after the initial diagnosis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Immunohistochemical findings. A. TFE-3 showing nuclear staining. B. Cytoplasmic staining with MyoD1. C. Tumor cells were diffusely positive for SMA. D. Tumor cells were diffusely positive for vimentin.

Discussion

ASPS is a rare soft tissue tumor that accounts for about 0.5% to 1% of soft tissue sarcomas. In the population, the age of onset is mostly 15 to 35 years [2], which is more common in females than males [3]. The tumor grows slowly and is painless in the early stages. It often occurs in the deep muscles or fascia of the extremities, and a few can be found in the abdominal wall, para-anal area, tongue, retroperitoneum, and back of neck. Fanburg-Smith et al. [4] reported 266 cases of ASPS from 1970 to 2004, of which only 14 were located in the tongue, accounting for only 5% of all ASPS. ASPS usually metastasizes early, and distant metastasis will occur even if there is no tumor recurrence at the primary site. The ASPS that occurs in the tongue involves important organs and is superficial. It is usually found earlier than other parts and does not spread far away. The patient was a 24-year-old woman whose tumor occurred in the dorsum of left tongue. She had a medical history of nearly one year, no obvious pain, no significant increase in mass, and a relatively limited lesion. Imaging studies showed no metastatic lesions.

Table 1 summarizes all reported cases of tongue ASPS, totaling fifty cases, including the present series. Affected were 26 females and 24 males. Presenting symptoms and signs occurred between 0.5 month and 108 months prior to diagnosis (median 5 months) and the median age at diagnosis was 8.5 years, ranging from 0.9 to 64 years. In all patients, the dorsal surface and the base of the tongue were affected in 28% (14/50) and 24% (12/50) of the cases, respectively. 1/50 cases involved both the dorsal surface and the base of the tongue, and 23/50 cases did not provide the specific location of the tumor in the tongue. The tumor size was reported in 38 cases, ranging from 8 to 80 mm (mean, 2.8 cm). The median follow-up time was 3 years (0.3-32 years). During follow-up, the majority of patients (33/50, 66%) still showed no signs of disease. Recurrence or metastasis occurred in 3 cases after diagnosis, and 2 cases died of ASPS. In 12/50 patients, no specific clinical course information was available.

Table 1.

Reported cases of tongue ASPS

Case Author Year Age (years)/Sex Tumour size (cm)/Tumour duration (months) Location on the tongue Treatment Follow-up (years) Clinical course
1 Spector RA [17] 1979 17/F 4.8/3 Right base WSE 3 Metastases to lung, buttock
2 King VV [18] 1983 5/F 1/5 Right anterior WSE 2 NED
3 Komori A [19] 1984 11/F 2.5/ND Left side of the base WSE 5 NED
4 Donald PJ [20] 1987 19/F ND/36 Left side WSE 1.5 NED
5 Simmons WB [21] 1989 1.6/F 2.5/2.3 Midline dorsal WSE 3.6 NED
6 Cetik F [22] 1989 13/F 1.5/3 Left middle part WSE ND ND
7 Takita MA [23] 1990 19/M ND/ND Dorsum WSE 3 NED
8 Ooi LP [24] 1993 21/M 4/12 Dorsum WSE 0.3 NED
9 Carson HJ [25] 1993 64/M 8/ND Base External beam radiation therapy and Adriamytin 3 DOD
10 Castle JT [26] 1999 3/M ND/0.7 Mid-dorsum WSE 0.7 NED
11 Bentley RP [27] 1999 5/F ND/ND Left of the midline WSE 1 recurrence and metastatic
12 Yoshida K [28] 2000 2/F 2/ND Left dorsum WSE 7.2 NED
13 Aiken AH [29] 2003 34/F ND/3 Right base Surgery ND ND
14 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 3/F 2.5/6 Right side Surgery 11 NED
15 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 3/M 0.8/1 Right side Surgery 4 NED
16 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 3/F ND/ND Left lateral side Surgery 10 NED
17 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 5/M ND/ND Base Surgery 11 Alive
18 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 5/F 5/2 Right lateral side Surgery 32 NED
19 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 5/F 1/0.5 Midportion Surgery 22 NED
20 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 5/F ND/24 Left side Surgery ND ND
21 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 6/M ND/12 Tongue Surgery ND ND
22 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 6/M 2.5/5 Dorsum Surgery 28 Alive
23 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 7/M 1.3/ND Undersurface Surgery 27 Alive
24 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 7/M 2.5/ND Left side Surgery 16 NED
25 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 17/M 2.5/ND Posterior Surgery 25 NED
26 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 20/M 1/3 Right posterior Surgery ND ND
27 Fanburg-Smith JC [4] 2004 21/F 3/ND Left side Surgery ND ND
28 Kim HS [30] 2005 16/M ND/6 Tongue WSE 6 NED
29 Kim HS [30] 2005 4/F ND/8 Tongue WSE 8 NED
30 Nascimento Souza KC [31] 2005 13/F 3/108 Left side of the dorsum Surgery 5 NED
31 Raghunandhan S [32] 2007 13/F 2.5/4 Base WSE 0.5 NED
32 Tapisiz OL [33] 2008 18/F 4.5/5 Right dorsum ND ND Unknown
33 Rodríguez-Velasco A [34] 2009 2/F 1.5/3 Lateral right Chemotherapy 2.8 NED
34 Baglam T [35] 2009 18/F 6/6 Base WSE 0.8 DOD
35 Noussios G [16] 2010 3/M 3.3/6 Mid-dorsum area of the tongue extending to its base WSE 3.5 NED
36 Eley KA [36] 2010 24/M 1/1.4 Left lateral WSE 1 NED
37 Kumar M [37] 2010 7/M 2.5/30 Right dorsolateral aspect Surgery 0.9 NED
38 Anbarasi K [38] 2011 25/M 4/36 Right dorsum WSE 3 NED
39 Argyris PP [39] 2013 4/M 2/ND Left dorsal side WSE 0.6 NED
40 Wang HW [1] 2015 20/F 2.5/ND Base ND 2.8 NED
41 Wang HW [1] 2015 3/F 3.5/ND Base ND 0.8 NED
42 Wang HW [1] 2015 11/M 3/ND Dorsal ND 1.2 NED
43 Wang HW [1] 2015 7/M 4/ND Base ND 2.4 NED
44 Wang HW [1] 2015 16/F 3.3/ND Base ND 2.9 NED
45 Wang HW [1] 2015 10/M 3.5/ND Base ND 6.4 NED
46 Yoshihiro T [40] 2017 23/M ND/24 Tongue Surgery 0.3 Recurrence and Metastatic
47 Alegría-Landa V [41] 2019 53/M 2/8 Right side of the tip WSE ND ND
48 Ruffle A [42] 2019 0.9/F 3.7/ND Right aspect Surgery 1.2 NED
49 Hsu CW [43] 2019 3/M 1.2/3 Right posterior dorsal Surgery ND ND
50 Present case 2019 24/F 2.5/12 Midline dorsal Surgery 1 NED

F, female; M, male; ND, no data; NED, no evidence of disease; DOD, dead of disease; WSE, indicates wide surgical excision.

Most of the ASPS tumors are round, oval, or nodular, and a few may have an envelope. Tumors that occur in the tongue are usually smaller and most of the tumors on the extremities are larger. Tumors are separated into cell nests of different sizes by fibrous spaces of varying widths. Cell nests tend to be uniform and have pseudoglandular structures. The interstitial fibrous connective tissue compartment contains a flat endothelial-lined sinus-shaped blood channel. Histologically, tumor cells are round or polygonal, the size and shape are more consistent, and the nucleoli are obvious. Cell boundaries are clear, cytoplasm is rich, eosinophilic, and finely granular. The specimen of this case was gray-white, the capsule was intact, and the tumor cells were arranged in organoid pattern. The tumor cells were large round, with obvious nucleoli; a vascular network was seen around the tumor cell cluster, and needle-like or rod-like crystals were seen by PAS staining.

MyoD1 was positive in the cytoplasm in ASPS, and it was occasionally positive for desmin, S-100 protein and NSE staining, but these were not diagnostic. Epithelial markers and endocrine markers such as CK, EMA, CgA, and Syn were negative. Manystudies have shown that TFE-3 polyclonal antibodies have a certain specificity for the diagnosis of ASPS, and the sensitivity and specificity can even exceed 95% [5]. In 1995, the non-equilibrium t (x; 17) (p11.2; q25) chromosomal translocation was first discovered in ASPS, and the ASPL-TFE3 fusion gene produced by this translocation was detected. This expression, is highly specific in ASPS [6,7]. Many studies have confirmed the existence of ASPL-TFE-3 fusion transcripts in ASPS patients [8]. Immunohistochemical results of the patient showed a strong nuclear immune response to TFE-3. The tumor cells were diffusely positive for vimentin, SMA. MyoD1, Ki-67 were focally positive, and the FISH detection showed t (Xp11.2) (TFE-3): (+), that is, TFE-3 gene-related translocation.

The location of ASPS has a great impact on the diagnosis of ASPS. When tumors occur in the tongue, they should be distinguished from the following diseases. Granular cell tumors mostly occur in middle-aged and elderly people. There is no capillary network and no cytoplasmic glycogen in fibrous connective tissue. PAS staining was negative, while S-100, SOX10, inhibitor, nestin were positive [9]. PEComa is similar to ASPS, with eosinophilic cytoplasm, granular cytoplasm that is PAS positive, and nuclear TFE-3 is positive. However, PEComa expresses MART-1 and HMB-45, while ASPS does not [10]. Rhabdomyosarcoma occurs in skeletal muscle. The cells are large and polygonal, with vacuoles in the cytoplasm and no nuclear atypia. Granular or rod-shaped inclusions in the cytoplasm are similar to the PAS-stained crystals of ASPS cytoplasm. Desmin and myogenin positive expression is seen in rhabdomyoblast cells. Paragangliomas occur in middle-aged and elderly people. The predominant site is the peritoneum, followed by the head and neck. Primary paragangliomas express neuroendocrine markers such as Syn, CgA, and S-100. However, PAS staining is negative. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma shows small, round or oval tumor cells separated by connective tissue into nests, lacking sinusoidal vascular network, strong eosinophilic cytoplasm, and occasionally multinucleated tumor giant cells. Tumor cells can express myogenin, or MyoD1, of which MyoD1 is nuclear-positive, but MyoD1 is expressed in the cytoplasm in ASPS.

20% to 25% of patients have tumor that has metastasized at the beginning of consultation, so the prognosis is poor. Wang et al. [11] reported that surgery and radiotherapy for patients with non-metastatic disease can achieve better results. Especially with postoperative treatment, Blackmon et al. [12] reported that surgery for patients with stage IV ASPS is still effective. The status of the surgical margin plays a vital role in the prognosis. Once the surgical margin is positive, the risk of postoperative recurrence increases, and the prognosis is poor [13]. However, ASPS of the tongue has its own characteristics: the course of ASPS in the tongue is shorter and the rate of metastasis is lower. Due to the limited size of tissue in the area, the complete expansion and resection of the mass often seriously affects the patient’s body function. Therefore, for ASPS of the tongue that cannot be resected, postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy effective. A study by Ogose et al. [14] found that postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy can help delay local tumor recurrence. For patients with distant metastases and patients with advanced disease, in recent years, there has been more and more research on antiangiogenic drugs. In particular, sildenib has been demonstrated in large-scale clinical studies for its significant activity and safety [15]. The current patient underwent an extended resection of the tumor of the left tongue. An intact capsule was seen during the operation. Because of the preoperative tendency to benign lesions, no cryopathology was done. Imaging studies showed no metastatic lesions. No radiotherapy or radiotherapy was performed after the operation, and the patient is currently in stable condition. After 12-month of follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis was found.

Conclusion

In summary, ASPS rarely occurs in the head and neck and it occurs more rarely in the tongue. It can be found from this report that the ASPS in the tongue typically occurs in children and adolescents. Literature review indicates that tongue ASPS tends to be small, and it is found mainly in the base of the tongue and dorsal surface. The prognostic factors of ASPS are related to the age of onset, the size of the primary lesion, whether the surgical resection is complete, and whether metastasis has occurred [16]. Due to the short course of ASPS that occurs in the tongue and the smaller size, the prognosis is better after complete resection.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Wang HW, Qin XJ, Yang WJ, Xu LQ, Ji T, Zhang CP. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the oral and maxillofacial region: clinical analysis in a series of 18 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119:396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferrari A, Sultan I, Huang TT, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Shehadeh A, Meazza C, Ness KK, Casanova M, Spunt SL. Soft tissue sarcoma across the age spectrum: a population-based study from the surveillance epidemiology and end results database. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57:943–949. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Orbach D, Brennan B, Casanova M, Bergeron C, Mosseri V, Francotte N, Van Noesel M, Rey A, Bisogno G, Pierron G, Ferrari A. Paediatric and adolescent alveolar soft part sarcoma: a joint series from European cooperative groups. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:1826–1832. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M, Folpe AL, Weiss SW, Childers EL. Lingual alveolar soft part sarcoma; 14 cases: novel clinical and morphological observations. Histopathology. 2004;45:526–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01966.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ju X, Sun K, Liu R, Li S, Abulajiang G, Zou H, Lan J, Ren Y, Jiang J, Liang W, Pang L, Li F. Exploring the histogenesis and diagnostic strategy using immunoassay and RT-PCR in alveolar soft part sarcoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2018;24:593–600. doi: 10.1007/s12253-017-0280-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Williams A, Bartle G, Sumathi VP, Meis JM, Mangham DC, Grimer RJ, Kindblom LG. Detection of ASPL/TFE3 fusion transcripts and the TFE3 antigen in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in a series of 18 cases of alveolar soft part sarcoma: useful diagnostic tools in cases with unusual histological features. Virchows Arch. 2011;458:291–300. doi: 10.1007/s00428-010-1039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jabbour MN, Seoud M, Al-Ahmadie H, Abdul-Karim FW, Zaatari GS. ASPL-TFE3 translocation in vulvovaginal alveolar soft part sarcoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014;33:263–267. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e318290407c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Selvarajah S, Pyne S, Chen E, Sompallae R, Ligon AH, Nielsen GP, Dranoff G, Stack E, Loda M, Flavin R. High-resolution array CGH and gene expression profiling of alveolar soft part sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1521–1530. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chamberlain BK, McClain CM, Gonzalez RS, Coffin CM, Cates JM. Alveolar soft part sarcoma and granular cell tumor: an immunohistochemical comparison study. Hum Pathol. 2014;45:1039–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Williamson SR, Bunde PJ, Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A, Zhang S, Wang M, Maclennan GT, Cheng L. Malignant perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) of the urinary bladder with TFE3 gene rearrangement: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1619–1626. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318293729d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang H, Jacobson A, Harmon DC, Choy E, Hornicek FJ, Raskin KA, Chebib IA, DeLaney TF, Chen YL. Prognostic factors in alveolar soft part sarcoma: a SEER analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:581–586. doi: 10.1002/jso.24183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blackmon SH, Shah N, Roth JA, Correa AM, Vaporciyan AA, Rice DC, Hofstetter W, Walsh GL, Benjamin R, Pollock R, Swisher SG, Mehran R. Resection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary sarcomatous metastases is associated with long-term survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:877–884. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.144. discussion 884-885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pennacchioli E, Fiore M, Collini P, Radaelli S, Dileo P, Stacchiotti S, Casali PG, Gronchi A. Alveolar soft part sarcoma: clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome in a series of 33 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3229–3233. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1186-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ogose A, Yazawa Y, Ueda T, Hotta T, Kawashima H, Hatano H, Morita T. Alveolar soft part sarcoma in Japan: multi-institutional study of 57 patients from the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. Oncology. 2003;65:7–13. doi: 10.1159/000071199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kummar S, Allen D, Monks A, Polley EC, Hose CD, Ivy SP, Turkbey IB, Lawrence S, Kinders RJ, Choyke P, Simon R, Steinberg SM, Doroshow JH, Helman L. Cediranib for metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:2296–2302. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.4288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Noussios G, Chouridis P, Petropoulos I, Karagiannidis K, Kontzoglou G. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue in a 3-year-old boy: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2010;4:130. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-4-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Spector RA, Travis LW, Smith J. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 1979;89:1301–1306. doi: 10.1002/lary.1979.89.8.1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.King VV, Fee WE Jr. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue. Am J Otolaryngol. 1983;4:363–366. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(83)80023-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Komori A, Takeda Y, Kakiichi T. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the tongue. Report of a case with electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;57:532–539. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90313-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Donald PJ. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue. Head Neck Surg. 1987;9:172–178. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890090308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Simmons WB, Haggerty HS, Ngan B, Anonsen CK. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the head and neck. A disease of children and young adults. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1989;17:139–153. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(89)90089-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cetik F, Ozsahinoglu C, Kivanc F, Secinti E. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103:952–954. doi: 10.1017/s002221510011059x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takita MA, Morishita M, Iriki-In M, Sakuda M, Fukuda Y, Ishida T. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the tongue. Report of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;19:110–112. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80206-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ooi LP, Sim CS, Peck RH, Soo KC. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue: a case report. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63:240–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00529.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carson HJ, Tojo DP, Ghosh L, Molnar ZV. Primary alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue of an elderly man. A case report and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;76:62–67. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90296-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Castle JT, Goode RK. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue: report of an unusual pattern in a child. Ann Diagn Pathol. 1999;3:315–317. doi: 10.1016/s1092-9134(99)80029-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bentley RP, Wake MJ, Raafat F. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:451–454. doi: 10.1054/bjom.1999.0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yoshida K, Kurauchi J, Shirasawa H, Kosugi I. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue. Report of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;29:370–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aiken AH, Stone JA. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the tongue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1156–1158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim HS, Lee HK, Weon YC, Kim HJ. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the head and neck: clinical and imaging features in five cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1331–1335. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.do Nascimento Souza KC, Faria PR, Costa IM, Duriguetto AF Jr, Loyola AM. Oral alveolar soft-part sarcoma: review of literature and case report with immunohistochemistry study for prognostic markers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Raghunandhan S, Murali S, Nagasundaram J, Sudha Maheswari S, Kameswaran M. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of tongue base - a rare presentation of a rare tumor. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;59:393–395. doi: 10.1007/s12070-007-0113-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tapisiz OL, Gungor T, Ustunyurt E, Ozdal B, Bilge U, Mollamahmutoglu L. An unusual case of lingual alveolar soft part sarcoma during pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;47:212–214. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60083-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rodríguez-Velasco A, Fermán-Cano F, Cerecedo-Díaz F. Rare tumor of the tongue in a child: alveolar soft part sarcoma. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2009;12:147–151. doi: 10.2350/07-07-0317.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baglam T, Kalender ME, Durucu C, Bakir K, Karatas E, Kara F, Kanlikama M. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of the tongue. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:2160–2162. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181bf0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Eley KA, Afzal T, Shah KA, Watt-Smith SR. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the tongue: report of a case and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:824–826. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kumar M, Patne S, Vishwanath A, Hasan Z. Lingual alveolar soft part sarcoma in a child managed successfully with surgery and chemotherapy. Indian J Cancer. 2010;47:234–235. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.63023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Anbarasi K, Sathasivasubramanian S, Kuruvilla S. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma of tongue. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011;54:581–583. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.85099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Argyris PP, Reed RC, Manivel JC, Lopez-Terrada D, Jakacky J, Cayci Z, Tosios KI, Pambuccian SE, Thompson LD, Koutlas IG. Oral alveolar soft part sarcoma in childhood and adolescence: report of two cases and review of literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2013;7:40–49. doi: 10.1007/s12105-012-0395-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yoshihiro T, Tsuchihashi K, Nio K, Arita S, Nakano T, Yasumatsu R, Jiroumaru R, Ariyama H, Kusaba H, Oda Y, Akashi K, Baba E. Lingual alveolar soft part sarcoma responsive to pazopanib: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8470. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alegría-Landa V, Lora V, Cota C, Kutzner H, Requena L. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the tongue. Am J Dermatopathol. 2019;41:218–220. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ruffle A, Cameron M, Jonas N, Levine S, Mills C, Hook CE, Murray MJ. Lingual alveolar soft part sarcoma in a 1-year-old infant: youngest reported case with characteristic ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2019;22:391–395. doi: 10.1177/1093526619830290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hsu CW, Tseng CH, Wang WC, Chen YK. Alveolar soft part sarcoma of tongue in a 3-year-old Taiwanese. J Dent Sci. 2019;14:325–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES