Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 4;12:35. doi: 10.1186/s13102-020-00180-1

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the two study populations < 40 years of age

The HITTS study (n = 16) The TEX study (n = 12)
HIT group (n = 6)
Mean ± SD or median (IR)
MICT group (n = 10)
Mean ± SD or median (IR)
HIT group (n = 8)
Mean ± SD or median (IR)
Control group (n = 4)
Mean ± SD or median (IR)
Age (years)
Range 18–39 in both studies 29.1 ± 7.6 27.8 ± 6.2 27.1 ± 7.6 28.0 ± 7.8
Gender (count) Women: 0, Men:6 Women:5, Men:5 Women: 3, Men: 5 Women: 2, Men: 2
Time after heart transplant at inclusion 11 ± 2.7 (weeks) 11 ± 1.5 (weeks) 4.4 ± 3.3 (years) 3.0 ± 0.0 (years)
Waitinglist (days) 70 (160) 62 (138)
Donor age (years) 31 (35) 31 (23) 33 (17) 38 (29)
Ischemic time (min) 209 (206) 214 (112) 225 (45) † 70 (95) †
Creatinine (μmol/l) 115 (35) 105 (60) 91 (28) † 77 (16) †
Primary diagnosis (count)
 Cardiomyopathy 3 9 7 3
 Coronary artery disease 1 0 0 0
 Other 2 1 1 1

p-value < 0.05 between groups at baseline (Mann-Whitney U -test). There were no other baseline differences between the exercise-groups

SD Standard deviation, IR Interquartile range, HIT High-intensity interval training, MICT Moderate intensity continuous training, HITTS High-intensity Interval Training in de novo heart Transplant recipients in Scandinavia, TEX Transplant EXercise