Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;14(5):801–805. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.045

Table 3.

Results of GAM regression.

States Parameter Estimates p-value
Andhra Pradesh Intercept, β0 −28.10783 0.2132
AT, β1 0.88819 0.1817
ARH, β2 0.49752 0.2597
MaxT, β3 −0.05697 0.5006
MinT, β4 0.13458 0.0712
ATxARH, β5 0.01415 0.2932
Delhi Intercept, β0 9.999257 0.216
AT, β1 −0.036883 0.902
ARH, β2 −0.207407 0.237
MaxT, β3 −0.103124 0.126
MinT, β4 −0.084796 0.313
ATxARH, β5 0.008437 0.148
Gujrat Intercept, β0 −3.37997 0.8149
AT, β1 −0.01978 0.9621
ARH, β2 −0.38041 0.3559
MaxT, β3 0.0485 0.6484
MinT, β4 0.20924 0.0209a
ATxARH, β5 0.01318 0.2785
Madhya Pradesh Intercept, β0 −43.84455 0.0161a
AT, β1 1.42575 0.0171a
ARH, β2 1.21126 0.0341a
MaxT, β3 0.05988 0.6292
MinT, β4 0.01476 0.8649
ATxARH, β5 0.03761 0.0336a
Maharashtra Intercept, β0 −73.01116 0.08333
AT, β1 2.75604 0.04875a
ARH, β2 0.85921 0.14815
MaxT, β3 −0.31561 0.00205a
MinT, β4 0.10324 0.32944
ATxARH, β5 0.02675 0.16511
Punjab Intercept, β0 −32.17071 0.01551a
AT, β1 1.48788 0.00664a
ARH, β2 0.58497 0.00540a
MaxT, β3 0.01837 0.86233
MinT, β4 0.16984 0.18284
ATxARH, β5 0.02753 0.00058a
Rajasthan Intercept, β0 −2.751481 0.587
AT, β1 0.255311 0.23
ARH, β2 0.149194 0.394
MaxT, β3 −0.071146 0.413
MinT, β4 0.053367 0.366
ATxARH, β5 −0.004053 0.462
Tamil Nadu Intercept, β0 464.62175 0.0167a
AT, β1 −15.89823 0.0127a
ARH, β2 −6.79347 0.0115a
MaxT, β3 0.43246 0.0158a
MinT, β4 −0.09937 0.4576
ATxARH, β5 0.22832 0.0102a
Telangana Intercept, β0 1.562944 0.965
AT, β1 −0.100075 0.925
ARH, β2 0.217862 0.756
MaxT, β3 0.142809 0.292
MinT, β4 0.117128 0.322
ATxARH, β5 −0.009049 0.673
Uttar Pradesh Intercept, β0 4.354975 0.586
AT, β1 −0.066434 0.851
ARH, β2 0.020638 0.899
MaxT, β3 −0.064778 0.606
MinT, β4 0.189119 0.040a
ATxARH, β5 −0.00067 0.908
West Bengal Intercept, β0 18.65133 0.4096
AT, β1 −0.666464 0.3498
ARH, β2 −0.06807 0.7822
MaxT, β3 −0.008686 0.9179
MinT, β4 0.159345 0.0991
ATxARH, β5 0.002448 0.7522
a

Significant with 95% confidence.