Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;9(1):903–912. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1756697

Table 3. RT-qPCR and sequencing results for 11 mosquito pools.

  JCV RT-qPCR results No. JCV sequencing reads No. total sequencing reads
Sample Positive Mean Ct Mean copies/uL Library 1 Library 2 Library 1 Library 2
No template controls 2/75 35.5 NA NA NA NA NA
Pool 1 1/3 36.6 0.8 0 NA 2,780,216 NA
Pool 2 1/3 35.6 0.4 0 NA 3,436,372 NA
Pool 3 0/3 NA NA 0 NA 4,640,644 NA
Pool 4 3/3 39.2 <0.1 0 NA 2,796,224 NA
Pool 5 3/3 34.1 0.4 0 NA 2,714,312 NA
Pool 6 2/3 41 <0.1 0 NA 2,390,196 NA
Pool 7 3/3 36.1 0.1 0 NA 1,687,562 NA
Pool 8 2/3 35.7 0.2 2 0 3,694,624 4,782,330
Pool 9 3/3 37.1 0.4 6 4 3,725,980 5,849,716
Pool 10 (screening) 3/3 25.7 272.9 390 >1000 1,597,522 7,602,802
Pool 10 (deep sequencing)       >1500 >4000 13,829,206 32,622,656
Pool 11 1/3 33.4 2.7 0 NA 1,971,412 NA

Notes: Pool 10 was positive by RT-qPCR (all replicates positive, below the Ct of no template controls), while Pool 3 was a negative control and the remaining pools were negative for JCV by RT-qPCR, but showed some amplification close to the threshold. Based on sequencing results from both libraries combined, Pools 9 and 10 were confirmed as positive for JCV. Pool 10 underwent deeper sequencing in order to assemble a full JCV genome.