Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;31(9):107717. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107717

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Genetic Interactions between FD and FDP

(A) Flowering times of the illustrated genotypes under LDs.

(B) Plants of the illustrated genotypes grown under LDs for 36 days.

(C) Flowering times of 35S::HA:FDP and 35S::GFP:FDP transgenic plants compared to WT.

(D) Flowering times of the illustrated genotypes grown under LDs.

(E) Plants of the illustrated genotypes grown under LDs for 28 days.

(F) Rosette leaves series of 35S::HA:FD, 35S::HA:FD, and WT of 28-day-old plants.

In (A) and (F), one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey test was used. In (C), one-way ANOVA followed by the Holm-Sidak test was used. Shared letters between the genotypes in (A), (C), and (F) indicate no significant difference in flowering time. In (A) and (F), groups were considered statistically different when p ≤ 0.001, whereas in (C) when p ≤ 0.05. Scale bars, 1 cm (F) and 2.5 cm (B).