Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;11:867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00867

TABLE 7.

Results of the hierarchical multiple regressions for model 1b using LD and MI.

b SE β t p ΔR2 df ΔF p









Step LD MI LD MI LD LD MI LD MI LD LD LD LD
1 0.09 2, 69 3.42 0.038
CR 0.28 0.25 0.11 0.11 0.29 2.52 2.39 0.014 0.017
ER-IAT 0.09 0.02 0.24 0.23 0.04 0.38 0.09 0.706 0.931
2 0.01 1, 68 0.42 0.519
CR 0.29 0.26 0.11 0.11 0.30 2.58 2.49 0.012 0.013
ER-IAT 0.08 0.03 0.24 0.23 0.04 0.34 0.14 0.733 0.889
CR*ER-IAT 0.15 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.08 0.65 1.11 0.519 0.268
3 0.10 2, 66 3.91 0.025
CR 0.26 0.22 0.11 0.10 0.28 2.45 2.20 0.017 0.028
ER-IAT 0.13 0.10 0.23 0.22 0.06 0.55 0.45 0.583 0.651
CR*ER-IAT 0.28 0.29 0.23 0.22 0.14 1.21 1.34 0.231 0.181
Agency 2.56 2.85 0.93 1.01 0.32 2.77 2.81 0.007 0.006
Communion 0.31 0.90 0.63 0.75 0.06 0.49 1.19 0.623 0.242

Bold coefficients refer to results from the analyses using listwise deletion. Italic coefficients refer to results from using multiple imputation. Standardized coefficients and change statistics are not available when using multiple imputation. LD, listwise deletion; MI, multiple imputation; CR, cognitive reappraisal; ER-IAT, Emotion Regulation-Implicit Association Test.