Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;11:867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00867

TABLE 9.

Results of the hierarchical multiple regression for Model 2b using LD and MI.

b SE β t p ΔR2 df ΔF p









Step LD MI LD MI LD LD MI LD MI LD LD LD LD
1 0.01 2, 69 0.23 0.794
ES 0.01 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.14 0.65 0.892 0.517
ER-IAT 0.16 0.06 0.25 0.24 0.08 0.65 0.25 0.517 0.803
2 0.07 1, 68 4.90 0.030
ES 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.34 0.60 0.732 0.550
ER-IAT 0.03 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.12 0.05 0.909 0.963
ES*ER-IAT 0.51 0.20 0.23 0.21 0.27 2.21 0.92 0.030 0.357
3 0.08 2, 66 3.30 0.043
ES 0.04 0.03 0.10 0.11 0.05 0.41 0.29 0.680 0.770
ER-IAT 0.09 0.07 0.25 0.24 0.04 0.35 0.29 0.731 0.775
ES*ER-IAT 0.44 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.23 1.95 0.98 0.055 0.326
Agency 2.36 3.01 0.93 1.04 0.29 2.54 2.89 0.014 0.005
Communion 0.30 0.80 0.67 0.87 0.05 0.45 0.92 0.653 0.369

Bold coefficients refer to results from the analyses using listwise deletion. Italic coefficients refer to results from using multiple imputation. Standardized coefficients and change statistics are not available when using multiple imputation. LD, listwise deletion; MI, multiple imputation; ES, expressive suppression; ER-IAT, Emotion Regulation-Implicit Association Test.