Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;106(6):734–747. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.006

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Biochemical and Cellular Analysis of mLoF and mGoF CaSR Mutations

(A) Plot presents mean ± SD of western blot analysis of lysates from three independent HEK293 cell transfections, as the percent of mature receptors ([mature/(immature + mature)]%) for WT (black bar), mGoF (white bars), and mLoF (gray bars) variants. Representative western blots presented in Figure S3. Statistical analysis was by Student’s t test, with p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.

(B) Plasma membrane localization was determined for WT (black bar), mGoF (white bars), and mLoF (gray bars) variants by ELISA of transiently transfected HEK293 cells, plotted as the mean ± SD of the percent of surface to total expression, for at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was by Student’s t test, with p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.

(C) Bar graph of EC50 values for WT (black bar), mGoF (white bars), and mLoF (gray bars) variants extracted from fits of dose-response relations for Ca2+e. Statistical analysis by F-test, with ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Titrations were done as described in Subjects and Methods, and plots of dose-response relations which were fitted to extract EC50s are presented in Figures S5 and S6. Numbering of residues for all graphs based on GenBank: NM_000388.4.