Table 4.
TGI-SR RES | CAPS RES | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | df1 | df2 | p value | F | df1 | df2 | p value | |
Legal status | 1.07 | 3 | 50 | .37 | 0.41 | 3 | 48 | .75 |
Language | 1.17 | 1 | 52 | .29 | 0.01 | 1 | 50 | .94 |
Work situation | 0.90 | 3 | 50 | .45 | 1.78 | 1 | 50 | .19a |
Housing problems | 1.21 | 1 | 52 | .28 | 0.14 | 1 | 50 | .72 |
Family separation close kin | 0.68 | 1 | 52 | .41 | 1.01 | 1 | 50 | .41b |
Ongoing conflict in country of origin | 1.36 | 1 | 52 | .25b | 4.83 | 1 | 50 | .033b |
Total number of stressors | 4.67 | 1 | 52 | .04 | 0.54 | 1 | 50 | .47 |
Due to the violation of the assumptions regarding outliers, normality and homogeneity, we have dichotomized “work situation” for this analysis into employed versus not employed. We also performed a robust regression of the original (non-dichotomized) “work situation” variable using the package “MASS” in R. For the TGI-SR difference the t-value was 0.51, for the CAPS difference the t-value was 0.97; both values were not significant.
Due to the violation of the assumption regarding homogeneity we have reported the Welsh test.
CAPS RES, Clinician Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder residual score; TGI-SR RES, Traumatic Grief Inventory Residual score.