Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;14:497. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00497

Table 3.

Significant results of hierarchical level models of intelligence and Iowa gambling task block performance.

Predictors β Standard Error Median value High median demographics Low median demographics
Model 1: Interaction effects of emotional intelligence*IGT block 1.663* 0.810 89.741 n = 20, M = 7, F = 13,
age 55–85 years
n = 19, M = 11, F = 8,
age 66–89 years
Interaction effects of cognitive intelligence*IGT block 1.372 0.813 118 n = 20, M = 10, F = 10,
age 60–89 years
n = 19, M = 8, F = 11,
age 55–80 years
Model 2: Interaction effects of experiential emotional intelligence
*IGT block
1.870* 0.931 95.020 n = 20, M = 10, F = 10,
age 55–85 years
n = 19, M = 8, F = 11,
age 66–89 years
Interaction effects of strategic
emotional intelligence*IGT block
0.464 1.000 90.577 n = 20, M = 5, F = 15,
age 55–85 years
n = 19, 1 M = 13, F = 6,
age 61–89 years
Interaction effects of verbal comprehension cognitive intelligence
*IGT block
0.987 0.969 115 n = 20, M = 7, F = 13,
age 60–89 years
n = 19, M = 11, F = 8,
age 55–76 years
Interaction Effects of perceptual reasoning
cognitive intelligence*IGT block
0.174 0.896 117 n = 20, M = 9, F = 11,
age 66–89 years
n = 19, M = 9, F = 10,
age 55–84 years

N = 39,

*

p < 0.05. Dependent Variable: Economic Decision-Making (IGT net score by block). M, male, F, female.

Control Variable: Sex.