Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Geriatr Rep. 2020 Mar 14;9(2):72–81. doi: 10.1007/s13670-020-00311-z

Table 1.

Selection of telemedicine and tele-rehabilitation studies in Parkinson’s disease and related disorders from 2015 to 2019

Author Year Study Design Sample Size Sample Population Disease Severity Authors’ Conclusions
TELEMEDICINE Beck et al. [10] 2017 Randomized controlled trial 195 Individuals with Parkinson’s disease in the United States Mean disease duration 8.3 years; mean modified UPDRS Part III 29.5; mean MoCA 26.1 (Virtual care group, n = 97) Remote care is feasible, convenient, and neither more or less efficacious than in-person care
Tarolli et al. [19] 2019 Observational study 45 Individuals with atypical parkinsonian syndromes identified via Fox Trial Finder Mean disease duration 4.2 years; mean UPDRS Part III 40.4; mean MoCA 22.8; 55.6% requiring assistance with ADLs Virtual diagnosis of atypical parkinsonian syndromes is both feasible and reliable
Spear et al. [22] 2019 Survey 781 Individuals with Parkinson’s disease in the United States No disease severity data provided Interest in telemedicine is high; people consider access to specialty care the top advantage and lack of hands-on care the greatest disadvantage
Qiang et al. [23] 2015 Survey 137 Patients with Parkinson’s disease at Toronto Western Hospital who were both users and non-users of telehealth Mean disease duration 14.5 years, 29% with Hoehn and Yahr stage greater than or equal to 3; mean UPDRS Part III 24.2 (Users of telemedicine group, n = 34) Telemedicine spares patients commute time and money; training of telehealth nurses is a key factor to consider
Sekimoto et al. [24] 2019 Randomized crossover trial 10 Patients with Parkinson’s disease at Juntendo University Hospital in Tokyo Mean disease duration 7.3 years; mean Hoehn & Yahr stage 2.0; median UPDRS Part III 22.0 Telemedicine delivered via tablet is successful, leading to comparable outcomes (e.g., PDQ-39, Hoehn and Yahr Stage) as regular in-person visits
TELE-REHABILITATION Gandolfi et al. [28] 2017 Randomized controlled trial 76 Outpatients with Parkinson’s disease at neurorehabilitation centers in Italy Mean disease duration 6.2 years; median modified Hoehn and Yahr stage 2.5; mean UPDRS 44.1; mean MMSE 26.8 (Home-based group, n = 38) Home-based virtual reality balance training is a feasible alternative to in-person exercises for reducing postural instability
Seidler et al. [29] 2016 Randomized controlled trial 26 Individuals with mild-to-moderate Parkinson’s disease Mean time since diagnosis 4 years; mean Hoehn & Yahr stage 2.5; mean MMSE 28.5 Virtual instruction of a tango class is feasible and has comparable effects on motor function to in-person instruction
Griffin et al. [30] 2017 Non-randomized trial 29 Individuals with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and moderate hypokinetic dysarthria No quantitative disease severity data provided Lee Silverman Voice Treatment is non-inferior when delivered via iPad compared to in person
Theodoros et al. [31] 2016 Randomized controlled trial 52 Individuals with Parkinson’s disease and dysarthria from a metropolitan area Mean time since diagnosis 4.7 years; mean Hoehn & Yahr stage 2 (Online group, n = 36) Online, home-based speech treatment leads to similar acoustic, perceptual, and quality of life outcomes as in-person treatment
Quinn et al. [33] 2019 Observational study 8 Individuals with Parkinson’s disease who had previously received LSVT LOUD® treatment Mean time since diagnosis 4.5 years; mean Hoehn & Yahr stage 1.94; mean MoCA 24.9 Improvements in voice sound pressure level result from group speech therapy delivered via tele-rehabilitation
Seritan et al. [39] 2019 Observational study 33 Patients with a neurological disease seen by telepsychiatry at an academic center 61% with DBS; 39% with “mild or major” neurocognitive disorder Telepsychiatry is feasible and leads to high patient satisfaction and greater access to mental health care