Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;14(2):217–223. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709922

Table 3. Correlation matrix of mean flexure strength results (Pearson’s).

Beautifil II Esthet X Filtek Supreme Ultra TPH3 Z250
n = 20; r = Pearson’s correlation coefficient; r 2 = determination coefficient Correlation matrix represents comparison of all materials’ results with each other using all data points (baseline through 30 months).
Beautifil II 1.0 r = 0.84
p = 0.004
r 2 = 0.71
r = 0.81
p = 0.007
r 2 = 0.65
r = 0.84
p = 0.004
r 2 = 0.71
r = 0.58
p = 0.099
r 2 = 0.33
Esthet X r = 0.84
p = 0.004
r 2 = 0.71
1.0 r = 0.80
p = 0.008
r 2 = 0.64
r = 0.84
p = 0.008
r 2 = 0.71
r = 0.47
p = 0.198
r 2 = 0.22
Filtek Supreme Ultra r = 0.81
p = 0.007
r 2 = 0.65
r = 0.84
p = 0.008
r 2 = 0.71
1.0 r = 0.56
p = 0.109
r 2 = 0.31
r = 0.58
p = 0.095
r 2 = 0.33
TPH3 r = 0.84
p = 0.004
r 2 = 0.71
r = 0.84
p = 0.008
r 2 = 0.71
r = 0.56
p = 0.109
r 2 = 0.31
1.0 r = 0.64
p = 0.06
r 2 = 0.41
Z250 r = 0.58
p = 0.099
r 2 = 0.33
r = 0.47
p = 0.198
r 2 = 0.22
r = 0.58
p = 0.095
r 2 = 0.33
r = 0.64
p = 0.06
r 2 = 0.41
1.0