Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;14(2):217–223. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709922

Table 4. Correlation matrix of mean flexural modulus results (Pearson’s).

Beautifil II Esthet X Filtek Supreme Ultra TPH3 Z250
n = 20; r = Pearson’s correlation coefficient; r 2 = determination coefficient
Correlation matrix represents comparison of all materials’ results with each other using all data points (baseline through 30 months).
Beautifil II 1.0 r = 0.65
p = 0.057
r 2 = 0.42
r = 0.62
p = 0.073
r 2 = 0.38
r = 0.71
p = 0.030
r 2 = 0.50
r = 0.61
p = 0.078
r 2 = 0.37
Esthet X r = 0.65
p = 0.057
r 2 = 0.42
1.0 r = 0.71
p = 0.031
r 2 = 0.50
r = 0.72
p = 0.028
r 2 = 0.65
r = 0.34
p = 0.36
r 2 = 0.11
Filtek Supreme Ultra r = 0.62
p = 0.073
r 2 = 0.38
r = 0.71
p = 0.031
r 2 = 0.50
1.0 r = 0.65
p = 0.045
r 2 = 0.42
r = 0.52
p = 0.006
r 2 = 0.67
TPH3 r = 0.71
p = 0.030
r 2 = 0.50
r = 0.72
p = 0.028
r 2 = 0.65
r = 0.67
p = 0.045
r 2 = 0.45
1.0 r = 0.52
p = 0.15
r 2 = 0.27
Z250 r = 0.61
p = 0.078
r 2 = 0.33
r = 0.34
p = 0.36
r 2 = 0.22
r = 0.82
p = 0.006
r 2 = 0.67
r = 0.52
p = 0.15
r 2 = 0.27
1.0