Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;115(6):885–894. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000596

Table 2: Q1. In adults with moderate-severe UC achieving resolution of rectal bleeding after induction therapy with a biologic or tofacitinib, how accurate is a fecal calprotectin cut-off of 50 for ruling out moderate to severe endoscopically active disease (Mayo endoscopy score 2/3), obviating the need for routine endoscopic assessment?

Population/Setting: Adults with moderate-severe UC who have resolution of rectal bleeding after biologic or tofacitinib induction therapy – low pre-test probability/likelihood of having moderate to severe endoscopically active disease (patients with rectal bleeding score 0 + stool frequency score 0/1) with observed prevalence of moderate to severe endoscopically active disease (Mayo endoscopy score 2/3) of 25%; Intermediate pre-test probability/likelihood of having endoscopically active disease (patients with rectal bleeding score 0 + stool frequency score 2 or 3) with observed prevalence of moderate to severe active endoscopically active disease (Mayo endoscopy score 2/3) of 65% Pooled sensitivity fecal calprotectin with cut-off ≤50 (±10)μg/g: 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.89) | Pooled specificity fecal calprotectin with cut-off ≤50 (±10)μg/g: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.82). Reference Test: Lower endoscopy, locally read

Test result Number of results per 1000 patients tested (95% CI) Number of studies, participants Quality of the Evidence (GRADE) Comments
Low-likelihood (Prevalence 25%) Intermediate-likelihood (Prevalence 65%)
True positives (patients with moderate to severe endoscopically active disease) 205 (185 to 223) 533 (481 to 579) 14 studies, 1658 patients ⊕⊕⊕○ MODERATE1 (Inconsistency) TP may lead to diagnostic endoscopy for confirmation and modification/optimization of therapy (if FC used as triage strategy), potentially reducing risk of disease-related complications. TP will have further testing (lower endoscopy) and/or intervention which may lead to side effects.
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as being in endoscopic remission or having mildly active disease) 45 (27 to 65) 117 (71 to 169) FN may lead to inadequate treatment and potentially increased risk of disease-related complications due to delay in detection of moderate to severe endoscopically active disease
True negatives (patients in endoscopic remission or having mildly active disease) 555 (488 to 615) 259 (227 to 287) TN will likely be reassured, avoid an invasive test but may still be retested with fecal calprotectin periodically
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having moderate to severe endoscopically active disease) 195 (135 to 262) 91 (63 to 123) FP will likely have further testing (if fecal calprotectin is used as triage strategy) or may be over-treated (if fecal calprotecin is used a test replacement strategy) and will increase anxiety, complications and resource use.
1

High unexplained heterogeneity, selective inclusion of studies corresponding to cut-off of ≤50 (±10) μg/g.