Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 6;143:62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.051

Table 1.

Perceived implications of urology training modifications, overall and by high COVID-19 region

Changes in Urology Services due to COVID-19 Have: Full Cohort High COVID-19 Region
No Yes P value
N = 170 N = 116 N = 54
Had a negative impact on surgical training: .40
 Disagree 8% 9% 4%
 Neutral 12% 12% 11%
 Agree 79% 77% 83%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 2%
Increased anxiety about competency on residency completion: .02
 Disagree 29% 35% 15%
 Neutral 19% 18% 20%
 Agree 51% 45% 63%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 2%
Allowed more time for self-directed learning: .35
 Disagree 5% 4% 7%
 Neutral 5% 3% 7%
 Agree 88% 91% 83%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 2%
Allowed more time for research: .07
 Disagree 7% 4% 13%
 Neutral 15% 14% 19%
 Agree 76% 80% 67%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 2%
Made me feel more pride in my work: .58
 Disagree 24% 22% 28%
 Neutral 45% 45% 46%
 Agree 29% 31% 24%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 2%
Improved morale .14
 Disagree 45% 40% 56%
 Neutral 31% 34% 26%
 Agree 22% 25% 17%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 2%
Increased the likelihood of postresidency fellowship training: .14
 Disagree 34% 38% 24%
 Neutral 55% 53% 59%
 Agree 9% 7% 13%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 4%
Disrupted home life: .51
 Disagree 24% 27% 19%
 Neutral 21% 20% 22%
 Agree 54% 52% 57%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 2%
Increased financial concerns: .99
 Disagree 32% 33% 31%
 Neutral 28% 28% 28%
 Agree 38% 38% 39%
 Unanswered 2% 2% 2%