Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;20:281. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02662-5

Table 2.

A subgroup analysis of the prevalence of depression among prisoners in Ethiopia based on random effect analysis

Subgroup Number of studies Estimates Heterogeneity
Prevalence (%) 95% CI I2 Q(DF) p-value
Region Amhara 3 44.43 43.36, 45.550 98.6% 139.17(2) P < 0.001
Oromia 2 41.9 41.73, 42.07 0% 0% (1) P = 1.00
Southern part 2 72.7 40.75, 104.65 99.8% 3420(1) P < 0.001
Addis Ababa 2 59.05 44.45, 73.65 99. 2% 1246.23(1) P < 0.001
Tools PHQ-9 5 51.24 42.23, 60.25 98.8% 921.57(4) P < 0.001
BDI-II 4 56.15 29.09, 83.11 99.6% 1742.86 (3) P < 0.001
Sample <  350 6 54.13 35.66, 72.60 99.2% 1242.12 (5) P < 0.001
≥ 350 3 51.93 38.08, 65.78 98.8% 935.75(2) P < 0.001
Sampling technique Simple random 4 53.1 42.23, 63.97 99% 1150.75(3) P < 0.001
Systematic and multi-stage 5 53.64 33.15, 74.13 99.4% 1624.13(4) P < 0.001

Key: BDI II Beck depression inventory II, DF Degree of Freedom, PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9