Table 4.

Prevalence ratios (PR) for poor health by intersectional positions^a adjusted for mediators in Spanish adults

Intersectional social positionsa	Model Ab		Model Bc			Model Cd			Model De
	Crude adjusted by age		All psychosocial factors		PR reduction	All material factors		PR reduction	All factors		PR reduction
	PR	95% CI	PR	95% CI	(%)	PR	95% CI	(%)	PR	95% CI	(%)
MNH	1		1			1			1
WNH	1.05	(0.93–1.19)	1.06	(0.94–1.20)	−24.98	1.03	(0.91–1.16)	41.42	1.05	(0.93–1.18)	9.35
MNL	1.17*	(1.03–1.32)	1.14*	(1.00–1.29)	17.17	1.17*	(1.03–1.32)	1.54	1.14*	(1.01–1.29)	16.09
WNL	1.25**	(1.09–1.41)	1.24**	(1.10–1.41)	2.73	1.22**	(1.07–1.39)	12.50	1.22**	(1.08–1.39)	11.42
MMH	1.61***	(1.42–1.72)	1.47***	(1.33–1.62)	23.85	1.54***	(1.40–1.70)	11.84	1.43***	(1.30–1.58)	29.54
WMH	1.79***	(1.58–1.92)	1.64***	(1.49–1.81)	18.89	1.66***	(1.50–1.82)	17.53	1.56***	(1.42–1.72)	29.04
MML	1.84***	(1.62–1.96)	1.60***	(1.46–1.76)	27.89	1.70***	(1.54–1.87)	16.62	1.54***	(1.40–1.69)	35.75
WML	2.11***	(1.86–2.24)	1.84***	(1.68–2.03)	24.01	1.86***	(1.69–2.05)	22.29	1.71***	(1.55–1.88)	36.24
	Estimates explanatory factors
Material scarcity						1.38***	(1.32–1.44)		1.26***	(1.21–1.31)
Unstable employment						1.22***	(1.15–1.29)		1.18***	(1.11–1.24)
Insecure residential area						1.21***	(1.14–1.28)		1.20***	(1.12–1-26)
Poor social support		1.43***		(1.34–1.52)					1.45***	(1.27–1.66)
Lack of social participation		1.49***		(1.43–1.55)					1.45***	(1.39–1.51)

*p-value < 0.05; **p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001

^aThe first letter of the intersectional social position is gender (M = Men, W=Women), the second letter is the social class (M = Manual, N=Non-manual) and the third letter is the regional development (H=High, L = Low)

^bModel A is the crude model

^cModel B is adjusted by psychosocial factors

^dModel C is adjusted by material factors

^eModel D is adjusted by all factors