Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;20:165. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01145-z

Table 2.

Comparison of linear measurements (mm3) performed on 3D project, prototyped and prototyped-scanned anterior mock-ups

Total sample Upper right central incisor Upper left central incisor Total Diameter
rU1h Significance rU1w Significance lU1h Significance lU1w Significance CCw Significance
3D Project [a] 10 10,72 ± 0,52 [c] p < 0.001 8,63 ± 0,40 [b,c] p < 0.001 10,68 ± 0,44 [c] p < 0.001 8,60 ± 0,46 [b] p < 0.001 39,43 ± 2,57 p < 0.001
Prototyped [b] 10 10,74 ± 0,48 [c] 8,87 ± 0,30 [a,c] 10,66 ± 0,52 [c] 8,85 ± 0,55 [a,c] 39,92 ± 3,37
Prototyped - scanned [c] 10 10,47 ± 0,38 [a,b] 8,69 ± 0,21 [a,b] 10,26 ± 0,48 [a,b] 8,62 ± 0,69 [b] 39,39 ± 3,01

P values set at p < 0.05 and based on Two-ways analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

rU1h right upper central incisor height, rU1w right upper central incisor width, lU1h left upper central incisor height, lU1w left upper central incisor width, CCw canine to canine width