Table 3.

Comparison of linear measurements (mm³) performed on 3D project, milled and milled scanned anterior mock-ups

	Total sample	Upper right central incisor			Significance	Upper left central incisor			Significance	Total Diameter	Significance
		rU1h	Significance	rU1w	Significance	lU1h	Significance	lU1w	Significance	CCw	Significance
3D Project	10	10,72 ± 0,52 [b]	p < 0.001	8,63 ± 0,40 [b]	p < 0.001	10,68 ± 0,44 [b]	p < 0.001	8,60 ± 0,46 [b]	p < 0.001	39,43 ± 2,57 [b,c]	p < 0.001
Milled	10	11,1 ± 0,39 [a,c]		8,90 ± 0,22 [a,c]		10,97 ± 0.49 [a,c]		8,92 ± 0.48 [a,c]		40,29 ± 2.72 [a,c]
Milled - scanned	10	10,70 ± 0,44 [b]		8,59 ± 0,36 [b]		10,69 ± 0,37 [b]		8,58 ± 0,59 [b]		39,33 ± 2,43 [a,b]

P values set at p < 0.05 and based on Two-ways analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

rU1h right upper central incisor height, rU1w right upper central incisor width, lU1h left upper central incisor height, lU1w left upper central incisor width, CCw canine to canine width