Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;6:10. doi: 10.1186/s40842-020-00098-0

Table 3.

Comparison of the Glycemic variability indices and AHI in the study population

VARIABLE Group A (n = 20)
Mean ± SD
Group B
(n = 20)
Mean ± SD
Group C
(n = 10)
Mean ± SD
Group D
(n = 10)
Mean ± SD
AHI 18.97 ± 13.59 3.50 ± 1.34 18.98 ± 13.72 3.51 ± 1.15
Time in Range (%) 67 ± 4.26 69 ± 3.54 89 ± 2.71 97 ± 1.33
Time above Range (%) 20 ± 2.5 19 ± 2.8 8 ± 1.2 0
Time below range (%) 13 ± 2.1 12 ± 1.8 3 ± 1.4 2 ± 0.5
Mean Glucose (mmol/L) 7.77 ± 2.42 6.81 ± 2.31 5.85 ± 2.10 4.83 ± 1.95
SD (mmol/L) 2.44 ± 1.10 1.91 ± 0.86 0.87 ± 0.16 0.68 ± 0.11
CV (%) 31% ± 4.5 28% ± 3.5 16% ± 2.8 14% ± 2.4
Night Mean glucose (mmol/L) 6.84 ± 1.82 6.70 ± 1.64 5.05 ± 0.20 4.70 ± 0.15
Night SD (mmol/L) 2.54 ± 1.76 1.96 ± 0.92 0.98 ± 0.14 0.74 ± 0.14
Night CV (%) 37 ± 2.5 29 ± 2.3 19 ± 1.2 15 ± 1.1
MAGE (mmol/L) 5.20 ± 2.15 2.67 ± 1.04 2.47 ± 0.42 0.77 ± 0.19
NMAGE (mmol/L) 5.78 ± 2.16 2.22 ± 1.00 2.85 ± 0.42 0.62 ± 0.15

One way ANOVA applied, data failed normality hence Kruskal Wallis test applied

P value was significant between all four groups

P <  0.05 was considered significant

Time in Range: 3.9 to 10 mmol/L, Time Below range: < 3.9 mmol/L, Time above range > 10 mmol/L