Table III.
Results from the Cox regression analyses.
| Model 1 a | Model 2 b | Model 3 c | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | P value | |
| Unipolar depression diagnosis by fatherhood status | |||||||||
| No child | 1.15 | 0.88–1.50 | 0.305 | 1.13 | 0.87–1.48 | 0.357 | 1.13 | 0.87–1.48 | 0.355 |
| Child | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||||||
| Unipolar depression diagnosis by infertility diagnosis | |||||||||
| Male factor infertility | 1.03 | 0.79–1.35 | 0.816 | 1.03 | 0.79–1.35 | 0.816 | 1.04 | 0.79–1.36 | 0.804 |
| Other infertility diagnosis’d | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||||||
Unipolar depression diagnosis by fatherhood status and infertility diagnosis among n = 34 817 men from the Danish National ART-Couple I (DANAC I) Cohort
aModel 1 = no fatherhood or male factor infertility diagnosis adjusted for age and ART treatment year.
bModel 2 = no fatherhood or male factor infertility diagnosis adjusted for age, ART treatment year and highest obtained educational level.
bModel 3 = mutually adjusted for no fatherhood and male factor infertility diagnosis; otherwise, adjusted as described in model 2.
dOther infertility diagnosis includes mixed female and male factor, ovulation disorder, tubal pathology, other female factor, or unexplained infertility. Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.