Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 6;24:301. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02979-3

Table 2.

Demographic data, the patient characteristics and ECMO data of 8 multicentre studies with H1N1 outbreak (2009–2010)

Study group Data collection/population ECMO pts./total H1N1 pts. Age of ECMO pts. (years) PaO2/FIO2a (mmHg) MV durationa (days) ECMO duration (days) Discharged aliveb, n (%)
ANZ ECMO Influenza Investigator [40] Retrospective/15 ICUs 68/194 34.4 (26.6–43.1) 56 (48–63) NA 10 (7–15) 32 (47.1%)
UK ERP with SwiFT study [41] Prospective/4 centres 75c 36.5 ± 11.4 54.9 ± 14.3 4.4 ± 3.7 NA 57 (76%)
Italian ECMO network [42] Prospective/14 ICUs 60/153 39 (32–46) 63.3 (56–79) 2 (1–5) 10 (7–17) 41 (68.3%)
Australian ERP [43] Retrospective 38 NA 63 NA NA 33 (86.8%)
Japanese Society [44] Retrospective/12 ICUs 14 54 50 (40–55) 5 (0.8–8.5) 8.5 (4.0–10.8) 5 (35.73%)
REVA Research Network in France [45] Prospective/114 ICUs 123 42 ± 13 63 ± 21 2 (1–5) 9.8 79 (64.2%)
Germany ARDS network [46] Retrospective/40 centres 61/116 42 (39–45)d 87 (74–101)d NA NA 28 (45.9%)
Italian ECMO network [47] Prospective/14 centres 60 39.7 ± 12 NA NA NA 41 (68.3%)

Mean ± SD or median (interquartile range)

ANZ Australia and New-Zealand, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ERP ECMO Retrieval Program, ICU intensive care unit, MV mechanical ventilation, NA not applicable, pts. patients, SwiFT Swine Flu Triage

aData before ECMO support

bDischarged alive of patients who underwent ECMO support

cMatched pairs among total 80 ECMO referred patients

dMean values (95% confidence interval)