Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2020 Apr 2;122:101935. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.101935

Table 2.

Odds of high IFN-gamma TB antigen response (≥10 IU/mL) among NHANES 2011–2012 participants with latent TB infection, N=513

Diabetes classification Odds ratio (95%CI) Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) * Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI)
Diabetes 1.9 (0.9, 4.1) 2.2 (1.0, 4.9) 1.8 (0.8, 4.3)
Pre-diabetes 1.8 (0.9, 3.6) 2.0 (1.0, 4.1) 1.9 (1.0, 3.6)
Euglycemic REF REF REF
Diabetes-poor control 3.2 (1.1, 8.8) 3.3 (1.1, 9.9) 2.7 (0.9, 8.3)
Diabetes- good control 1.2 (0.5, 2.5) 1.4 (0.7, 3.0) 1.1 (0.5, 2.7)
Pre-diabetes 1.8 (0.9, 3.6) 2.0 (1.0, 4.1) 1.9 (1.0, 3.6)
Euglycemic REF REF REF
Diabetes-new 1.7 (0.6, 4.9) 2.0 (0.7, 5.4) 1.5 (0.5, 4.1)
Diabetes-known 2.0 (1.0, 4.2) 2.3 (1.0, 5.2) 2.0 (0.8, 4.8)
Pre-diabetes 1.8 (0.9, 3.6) 2.0 (1.0, 4.1) 1.9 (1.0, 3.6)
Euglycemic REF REF REF
Pre-diabetes/diabetes 1.9 (1.1, 3.3) 2.1 (1.1, 3.9) 1.9 (1.0, 3.4)
Euglycemic REF REF REF
*

Adjusted for age and sex

Adjusted for age, sex, vitamin D, and BMI

Bold indicates 95% confidence interval estimate did not include null value