Table 6.

Comparison with MF-based models via 5-fold local Cross-Validation.

Datasets	Methods	AUPR	AUC
Pauwels	CMF∗	0.382 ± 0.006	0.894 ± 0.004
	GRMF∗	0.358 ± 0.008	0.883 ± 0.005
	NRLMF∗	0.374 ± 0.007	0.886 ± 0.004
	Our method	0.392 ± 0.008	0.889 ± 0.004
Mizutani	CMF∗	0.395 ± 0.005	0.889 ± 0.004
	GRMF∗	0.392 ± 0.008	0.890 ± 0.006
	NRLMF∗	0.390 ± 0.006	0.882 ± 0.005
	Our method	0.399 ± 0.013	0.886 ± 0.003
Liu	CMF∗	0.393 ± 0.007	0.894 ± 0.005
	GRMF∗	0.379 ± 0.008	0.895 ± 0.006
	NRLMF∗	0.398 ± 0.006	0.897 ± 0.004
	Our method	0.401 ± 0.015	0.891 ± 0.004

^∗Results are derived from [18].