Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: AAPS J. 2019 Feb 7;21(2):25. doi: 10.1208/s12248-018-0281-y

Table II.

In vitro measured aerosolization performance.

Description Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 3 vertical a
MMAD (μm) 1.56 (0.01) 1.89 (0.10) 1.77 (0.08) 1.57 (0.04) 1.64 (0.09) 1.84 (0.05)
FPF < 5μm/ED (%) 97.8 (0.1) 95.4 (1.9) 95.2 (0.4) 95.5 (1.2) 93.4 (1.3) 93.8 (1.1)
FPF < 1μm/ED (%) 23.9 (0.5) 18.6 (0.5) 20.2 (1.7) 22.5 (0.8) 23.0 (4.3) 21.8 (1.0)
GSD 1.80 1.85 1.87 1.80 1.86 1.98
ED (%) 63.1 (4.8) 58.8 (7.7) 84.6 (6.3) 44.8 (4.8) 57.3 (4.9) 85.1 (1.8)

Mean aerosol characteristics with standard deviations (SD) shown in parenthesis (n=3).

a

DAC unit was operated in the vertical position as shown in Figure 2b, with all other cases evaluated in the horizontal position.