Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jan 23;55(6):685–696. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01829-0

Table 3.

Associations between perceived neighborhood environment and cognitive function among men (n = 1,034)

Global Cognition Verbal Learning Memory Verbal Fluency Processing Speed
β (95% CI) B (95% CI) B (95% CI) B (95% CI) B (95% CI)
Neighborhood Problemsb
Model 1
Q1 (Low) 0.07 (−0.57, 0.71) 0.34 (−1.27, 1.95) 0.07 (−0.63, 0.77) 0.18 (−1.49, 1.85) −0.33 (−3.39, 2.74)
Q2 0.17 (−0.35, 0.69) −0.06 (−1.43, 1.32) 0.37 (−0.18, 0.92) 0.18 (−1.11, 1.47) 0.85 (−1.78, 3.47)
Q3 −0.08 (−0.61, 0.46) −0.15 (−1.49, 1.19) −0.02 (−0.63, 0.60) −0.27 (−1.77, 1.24) −0.30 (−2.68, 2.07)
Q4 0.30 (−0.16, 0.76) 0.85 (−0.31, 2.00) 0.23 (−0.35, 0.81) 0.01 (−1.35, 1.37) 1.76 (−0.50, 4.03)
Q5 (High) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref)
p-trend 0.992 0.901 0.726 0.763 0.636
Model 2
Q1 (Low) −0.18 (−0.83, 0.46) −0.21 (−1.85, 1.43) −0.19 (−0.86, 0.49) −0.16 (−1.86, 1.66) −1.31 (−4.41, 1.80)
Q2 −0.06 (−0.58, 0.46) −0.56 (−1.91, 0.79) 0.14 (−0.42, 0.69) −0.13 (−1.45, 1.18) −0.05 (−2.77, 2.66)
Q3 −0.25 (−0.76, 0.26) −0.53 (−1.86, 0.80) −0.19 (−0.81, 0.42) −0.50 (−1.95, 1.03) −0.98 (−3.39, 1.43)
Q4 0.18 (−0.26, 0.62) 0.57 (−0.55, 1.69) 0.11 (−0.46, 0.68) −0.16 (−1.53, 1.15) 1.27 (−0.98, 3.53)
Q5 (High) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref)
p-trend 0.398 0.390 0.650 0.882 0.249
Neighborhood Social Cohesion
Model 1
Q1 (Low) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref)
Q2 0.01 (−0.44, 0.46) 0.32 (−0.72, 1.37) 0.02 (−0.51, 0.55) −0.13 (−1.40, 1.15) −0.43 (−2.89, 2.02)
Q3 0.13 (−0.32, 0.58) 0.95 (−0.24, 2.13) 0.02 (−0.53, 0.58) 0.02 (−1.22, 1.27) −0.22 (−2.52, 2.07)
Q4 −0.09 (−0.56, 0.39) −0.02 (−1.07, 1.03) −0.39 (−1.04, 0.26) 0.38 (−0.98, 1.74) −0.25 (−3.00, 2.49)
Q5 (High) −0.15 (−0.72, 0.42) 0.24 (−1.17, 1.65) 0.16 (−0.77, 0.45) −0.55 (−2.12, 1.01) −1.26 (−3.96, 1.43)
p-trend 0.528 0.928 0.323 0.732 0.469
Model 2
Q1 (Low) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref)
Q2 −0.07 (−0.50, 0.36) 0.16 (−0.85, 1.17) −0.07 (−0.59, 0.55) −0.24 (−1.49, 1.02) −0.75 (−3.21, 1.71)
Q3 0.03 (−0.41, 0.48) 0.75 (−0.42, 1.91) −0.09 (−0.64, 0.47) −0.11 (−1.34, 1.12) −0.60 (−2.97, 1.77)
Q4 −0.23 (−0.70, 0.24) −0.30 (−1.34, 0.74) −0.54 (−1.19, 0.10) 0.19 (−1.18, 1.56) −0.79 (−3.59, 2.00)
Q5 (High) −0.28 (−0.88, 0.32) −0.02 (−1.49, 1.55) −0.30 (−0.91, 0.32) −0.72 (−2.36, 0.92) −1.75 (−4.54, 1.04)
p-trend 0.289 0.762 0.152 0.580 0.289
Neighborhood Safety from Crime
Model 1
Low (Worst) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref)
Medium 0.09 (−0.32, 0.49) 0.30 (−0.77, 1.36) −0.08 (−0.55, 0.39) 0.28 (−0.87, 1.44) 0.57 (−1.17, 2.30)
High 0.11 (−0.41, 0.63) 0.42 (−0.96, 1.79) −0.15 (−0.70, 0.39) −0.24 (−1.79, 1.32) 1.90 (−0.32, 4.12)
p-trend 0.679 0.552 0.577 0.767 0.094
Model 2
Low (Worst) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref) 0.00 (Ref)
Medium 0.01 (−0.37, 0.40) 0.15 (−0.89, 1.18) −0.16 (−0.62, 0.30) 0.18 (−0.95, 1.31) 0.31 (−1.37, 2.00)
High 0.00 (−0.51, 0.51) 0.20 (−1.17, 1.56) −0.27 (−0.82, 0.27) −0.39 (−1.92, 1.15) 1.53 (−0.75, 3.81)
p-trend 0.991 0.777 0.324 0.621 0.189

Note: Sample size is unweighted and all other values are weighted. Q = Quintiles.

a

Perceived neighborhood problems’ score range according to quintile and sample size: Q1: 0-7 (n = 143); Q2: 8-9 (n = 205); Q3: 10-11 (n = 194); Q4: 12-14 (n = 249); Q5: 15-28 (n = 238).

b

Perceived neighborhood social cohesion’s score range according to quintile and sample size: Q1: 5.0-13.0 (n = 236); Q2: 14-15 (n = 216); Q3: 16-17 (n = 221); Q4: 18-19 (n = 185); Q5: 19-25 (n = 171).

c

Perceived neighborhood safety categories’ sample size: Low: 268; Medium: 511; High: 250.

Model 1: Age, Hispanic/Latino background, language preference, field site, years living in neighborhood, annual household income, and education.

Model 2: Model 1 + depressive symptoms.

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001