Table 2.
Approaches | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|
Ultracentrifugation | Decreases the risk of contamination with bigger vesicles | Expensive equipment; contamination with protein complex and lipoproteins; disrupts EV membrane because of high force; low yield | (47, 49) |
Density gradient ultracentrifugation | Increases the purity of EV | Time-consuming; does not separate HDL from EV; low yield | (45, 48, 78, 93) |
Size exclusion chromatography | Fast; separates EV from HDL; reproducibility and purity; preserves vesicle integrity | Vesicles of the same size would be co-isolated with EV | (71, 74) |
Polyethylene glycol | Recovery of a higher yield; does not require expensive equipment; low volume necessary | Contamination with proteins, protein complexes, lipoproteins, and nucleoproteins as well as viral and other particles | (31, 32, 87) |
Immunocapture | Isolation of homogeneous population; does not require special equipment; decreases contamination with other vesicles | Markers for different cell types are currently unknown; high selectivity and cost; nonspecific binding | (16, 77, 96) |
EV, extracellular vesicle; HDL, high-density lipoproteins.