Table 2.
Effects of UERD oral solution on oocyst output, lesion score, and anticoccidial activity in broiler chickens against E. tenella (Guangdong strain) (n = 10).
| Groups | Initial body weight (g) | Final body weight (g) | BWG (g) | BWG rate (%) | rBWG (%) | Survival rate (%) | Mean lesion score | Lesion score | OPG (×106) | Oocyst value | Anticoccidial index (ACI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug level (v/v,%) | |||||||||||
| Group HC nontreated and noninfected Healthy control (HC) |
247.9 ± 16.8a | 366.7 ± 24.0b | 118.8 ± 12.4b | 48.0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 |
| Group IC nontreated and infected Infected control (IC) |
239.6 ± 22.6a | 319.4 ± 15.9a | 78.6 ± 8.0a | 32.9 | 68.5 | 70 | 3.85 ± 0.21a | 38.5 | 6.79 | 20 | 80.0 |
| Group DC 0.10% toltrazuril Positive drug control (DC) |
244.9 ± 23.1a | 347.3 ± 18.9b | 98.0 ± 8.8b | 39.6 | 82.5 | 90 | 3.55 ± 0.46a | 35.5 | 3.11 | 10 | 127.0 |
| Group A 0.25% UERD oral solution |
256.4 ± 24.3a | 316.3 ± 29.5a | 64.3 ± 11.1a | 25.5 | 53.1 | 90 | 3.40 ± 045a | 34.0 | 5.22 | 10 | 99.1 |
| Group B 0.50% UERD oral solution |
251.3 ± 19.7a | 355.9 ± 34.2b | 104.6 ± 19.9b | 41.6 | 86.7 | 100 | 3.30 ± 0.38a | 33.0 | 4.30 | 10 | 143.7 |
| Group C 1.50% UERD oral solution |
255.7 ± 24.6a | 371.2 ± 26.5b | 115.5 ± 9.22b | 45.6 | 95.0 | 100 | 3.40 ± 0.36a | 34.0 | 4.44 | 10 | 151.0 |
| Group D 2.50% UERD oral solution |
247.8 ± 20.2a | 352.3 ± 40.2b | 104.5 ± 21.6b | 41.9 | 87.3 | 100 | 3.30 ± 0.49a | 33.0 | 4.80 | 10 | 144.3 |
| Group E 3.50% UERD oral solution |
248.7 ± 18.8a | 339.4 ± 31.0a | 94.3 ± 19.9b | 38.4 | 80.0 | 90 | 3.20 ± 0.45a | 32.0 | 6.11 | 20 | 118.0 |
| Group F 5.00% UERD oral solution |
252.9 ± 17.5a | 336.2 ± 25.2a | 85.7 ± 14.8a | 33.9 | 70.6 | 90 | 2.95 ± 1.20a | 29.5 | 8.11 | 20 | 111.1 |
a-bMeans ± SD; means with different superscripts in the same column differ significantly (P < 0.05). BWG: body weight gain; rBWG: relative body weight gain; OPG: oocysts per gram; UERD: ultrasonic extract of Radix dichroae