Table 2.
Method Name | Procedure | Advantage | Disadvantage | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Direct methods | Direct diffusion method (Well and disc) |
The wood material is directly placed on microbe-inoculated agar or in a well and incubated for recommended time Presence of the zone of inhibition is considered a positive result |
1. Rapid and time saving 2. Applicable for low amount of material 3. Adapted for screening |
1. Disc preparation time 2. High variability for quantitative applications 3. Studies only the effect of agar-diffused chemicals 4. May require the sterilization of wood samples |
Culture-based microbial survival test | Initial microbial quantity is inoculated on wood samples and after the incubation time, the microbes are recovered, cultured, and viable cells are counted | 1. Can study the structural and chemical role of wood components 2. Qualitative and quantitative results 3. Applicable for low amount of material |
1. Difficulty in recovering all microbes present in pores 2. Microbial quantification is an extra step needed 3. Only viable cells are identified, while there can be still non-viable infectious cells present |
|
Microscopy | The behavior and distribution of inoculated microbes on wooden structures is observed via microscopy | 1. Rapid and time saving 2. Applicable for low amount of material 3. Adapted for screening |
1. May require the fixation of samples 2. Difficult to differentiate microbial structures from wooden structures 3. May require competencies of image analysis |
|
ATP luminescence | The ATP of microbes on wood is measured | 1. Rapid and easy 2. Applicable for low amount of material 3. Adapted for screening |
1. Difficult to differentiate the microbial ATP from other organic debris 2. Adapted only for solid surfaces |
|
Molecular biology methods | The quantity and viability of microbes is tested via nucleic acid amplification | Accurately measures the microbial survival | 1. Expensive 2. Require sophisticated handling |
|
Extractive based methods | Extractive-based diffusion and dilution method | Extractives are placed on agar or in agar wells, or in broth, after loading on filter paper discs or directly | 1. Adapted for qualitative and quantitative antimicrobial studies 2. Specific chemicals can be extracted depending upon the solvent used |
1. Involves chemical handling Extra step of extraction 2. One solvent cannot extract all active components 3. Does not study the role of structure of wood |
Bioautography | Extractives are loaded on a chromatographic layer, and then the diffusion of active chemicals is studied for their antimicrobial properties | 1. Adapted for qualitative antimicrobial studies 2. Specific chemicals can be extracted depending upon the solvent used and identified on the basis of their diffusion on the chromatographic layer |
1. Involves chemical handling and extraction 2. One solvent cannot extract all active components 3. Does not study the role of structure of wood 4. Not a quantitative method |
|
Mass spectrometry | The total profile of microbes is measured | 1. Applicable for a low amount of material 2. Accurately measure the content of the active ingredient |
For more specific results, the identified compounds are supposed to be tested by other culture-based methods |