Table 6.

Spearman’s rank-correlation test results.

Ranking Results
	$A_1$	$A_2$	$A_3$	$A_4$	$A_5$	$A_6$
The proposed method (P1)	5	4	2	1	6	3
The method using Archimedean operator by [32] (P2)	5	4	3	1	6	2
The method using logarithmic operation by [36] (P3)	5	3	2	1	6	4
The method using cosine similarity measures by [37] (P4)	3	2	4	1	5	6
The method using induced generalized aggregation operator by [45] (P5)	2	4	1	3	5	6
	Ranking Difference  $d_i$						Spearman’s Test Results
							$r_s$	Z
P1-P2	0	0	1	0	0	1	0.943	2.108
P1-P3	0	1	0	0	0	1	0.943	2.108
P1-P4	2	2	2	0	1	3	0.371	0.831
P1-P5	3	0	1	2	1	3	0.314	0.703