Skip to main content
. 2020 May 9;4(2):942–949. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa056

Table 3.

Carcass traits and beef production per ha of croplanda

Silage type (S) Inclusion rate (I) P-values
Item CON ENO 12% 24% SEMb S I S × I
Dressing percent, %c 64.67 64.38 64.47 64.50 0.191 0.30 0.70 0.83
HCW, kg 396 396 392 400 2.2 0.99 0.03 0.37
LM area, cmb 84.8 85.0 85.2 84.6 0.72 0.86 0.57 0.22
RF, cm 1.37 1.37 1.32 1.45 0.046 0.81 0.02 0.25
KPH, % 1.80 1.76 1.79 1.77 0.025 0.19 0.56 0.91
YG 3.33 3.33 3.23 3.43 0.044 0.94 0.01 0.04
RY, %d 49.82 49.86 50.04 49.63 0.098 0.80 0.01 0.06
Estimated EBF, %e 30.87 30.90 30.53 31.25 0.250 0.93 0.06 0.55
FBW at 28% EBF (AFBW), kgf 575 575 575 575 2.7 0.86 0.99 0.82
Marbling scoreg 532 510 519 522 12.7 0.25 0.85 0.39
Beef produced, kg/ha 2,121 1,974 2,008 2,087 25.7 <0.01 0.05 0.34

aSilage type: CON, conventionally available corn silage without α-amylase trait; ENO, silage from Syngenta Enogen Feed Corn. Dietary DM inclusion: 12, 12% inclusion of diet DM as corn silage; 24, 24% inclusion of diet DM as corn silage.

bPooled SEM.

cHCW/FBW shrunk 3%.

dAs a percentage of HCW.

eEstimated EBF and AFBW calculated according to the equations described by Guiroy et al. (2002).

fUSDA Marbling Score 400 = Small0 = Low Choice; 500 = Modest0 = Average Choice.