Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;17(10):3418. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103418

Table 1.

Performance of candidate materials (performance indices of two top candidates in respect of relevant performance are given in bold) (Data from CES EduPack 2019, Granta Design Limited, Cambridge, UK, 2019 [15]).

N Name Cost Per Unit of Stiffness (USD/(GPa1/3·m3)) Mass Per unit Stiffness (kg/(GPa1/3·m3)) (Place in the Order of Ascending Mass) Comments
1 Styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymer SMMA (clarity, stiffness) 1190–2520 716–743 (3) Susceptible for stress whitening
2 Polyethylene Terephthalate PET (unfilled, amorphous) 1240–1490 907–1010 (10) Not suitable for negative temperatures
3 SMMA (clarity, semi-tough) 1290–2730 773–808 (5)
4 Polypropylene PP (homopolymer, clarified/nucleated) 1340–1410 743–782 (4)
5 SMMA (ethyl acrylate terpolymer) 1370–2910 825–859 (8)
6 Polystyrene PS (heat resistant) 1440–1670 692–718 (2) Poor wear and fatigue resistance
7 PP (random copolymer, clarified/nucleated) 1470–1570 814–869 (7)
8 PS (general purpose, ‘crystal’) 147–1740 697–759 (3)
9 Styrene-Butadiene SB (stiffness) 1570–1740
10 Methyl methacrylate-acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene MABS (unfilled) 1710–1950 784–878 (6)
11 Polyvinyl chloride PVC (rigid, molding and extrusion) 1720–2010 890–1040 (9)
12 Styrene acrylonitrile SAN (molding and extrusion) 1910–2090 663–710 (1) Poor wear resistance

Note: Bold type is to highlight commonly recognized names of polymers identified in the Selection procedure above.