Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;10(5):302. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10050302

Table 1.

Current laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of acute human flavivirus infections.

Methods Advantages Critical Evaluation
RT-PCR
  • Diagnosis is performed by detection of viral nucleic acids.

  • Specificity and sensitivity.

  • Rapidity.

  • RT-PCR diagnosis test kits.

  • Positivity often limited to the acute stage of disease (2–7 days).

  • Flavivirus infection can cause a weak or no viremia.

Virus isolation
  • Direct pathogen detection plays a key role in diagnosing flavivirus infection

  • Biosafety Laboratory considerations (BSL levels 2 to 4).

  • Requirement of cultured cell lines for viral growth.

  • Virus identification using specific detection tools.

  • Time consuming.

Viral antigen capture
  • Diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection based on soluble NS1 capture.

  • Rapid diagnosis test kits.

  • Only available for dengue.

  • False-dengue positivity has been documented.

Serology
  • Diagnosis is performed by IgM and IgG capture or virus neutralization assays.

  • Qualitative and quantitative serologic diagnosis tests.

  • Licensed rapid serologic diagnosis test kits.

  • Specificity and sensitivity.

  • Complexity of serological flavivirus diagnosis.

  • False interpretation of dengue diagnostic serology tests during secondary dengue infection.

  • Virus neutralization assays require BSL levels 2 to 4.

  • Serological assays performed in BSL are time consuming.

  • Detection of antibodies does not exclude convalescent patients who may develop other illnesses with similar symptoms