Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 8;20:67. doi: 10.1186/s12862-020-01632-5

Table 2.

Summary of results for EVAC2 branch analysis and branchsite analysis for mammalian clades

EVAC2 LRTs for Branch Analysis LRTs for BS analysis Prop. of sites in ω classes (BS): Interpretation
Foreground branches 2Δ(M0-MC) 2Δ(MCfixed-MC) 2Δ(BSfixed-BS) ω 0 1 2a 2b PSS (BEB p < 0.05) Selection over whole sequence Selection on sites
Primates −1.59 −63.97(< 0.01) 0.02 0.33 0.61 0.39 0.00 0.00 conserved no
Rodentia −0.15 −148.19(< 0.01) 0.00 0.33 0.58 0.35 0.05 0.03 conserved no
Chiroptera −13.57(< 0.01) −5.47(0.05) 0.00 0.63 0.61 0.39 0.00 0.00 conserved no
Cetartiodactyla −4.82 − 113.47(< 0.01) 1.27 0.33 0.61 0.39 0.00 0.00 conserved no

Significant LRTs indicated in bold with FDR-corrected p-value in superscript, ω = clade omega as caculated by branch analysis, if LRT of M0 versus MC significant MC ω is reported if LRT non significant M0 ω is reported. ω site classes: 0: 0 < ω < 1 for foreground and background branches, 1: ω = 1 for foreground and background branches, 2a: 0 < ω < 1 for background and ω > 1 for foreground, 2b: ω =1 for background and ω > 1 for foreground. Applied models are explained in material and methods (MC = Clade model, BS = Branch-site model). PSS Positively selected sites, BEB Bayes empirical Bayes