Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;10(5):887. doi: 10.3390/ani10050887

Table 3.

Summary of the effects of formic acid and its salts on pig growth performance at different phase.

Acidifier Quantity % Phase ADG F:G G:F Reference
Formic acid 0.5 weaning = = [93]
0.2 weaning = = [19]
0.6 weaning 1 [8]
0.14 weaning 1 [8]
0.8 grower [94]
0.8 finisher = [94]
1 grower-finisher [16]
1.8 grower-finisher [17]
1 grower = [82]
0.8 grower-finisher [95]
1 grower [14]
1 finisher = [14]
Formic acid + ammonium formate 0.4 weaning = [34]
1.2 grower-finisher [95]
1 grower [15]
K-diformate 1.8 weaning [96]
- weaning [97]
1.8 weaning = = [69]
1.2 weaning [11]
1 weaning [12]
0.8 grower [16]
K-formate 1.56 weaning [11]
Ca-formate 1.2 weaning [13]
Ca/Na- formate 0.85 grower-finisher [16]
Blend_1 0.4 weaning = [34]
Blend_2 0.4 weaning [34]
Blend_3 0.3 grower-finisher = [98]

1 Results related to the first three weeks of administration; There were no significant differences after six weeks. Blend_1: 77.5% formic acid and ammonium formate, 20% propionic acid, and 2.5% potassium sorbate; Blend_2: 87.5% formic acid and ammonium formate, 20% propionic acid 10% propionic acid, and 2.5% sodium benzoate; Blend_3: 1% formic acid, 0.85% benzonic acid, 0.85% sorbic acid. ADG: average daily gain; F:G: feed to gain ratio; G:F: gain to feed ratio.