Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;9(5):655. doi: 10.3390/foods9050655

Table 2.

Qualitative analysis of the extracts obtained by different methods.

Peak Compound tR (min) m/z % Relative Area
LEA-M LEA-WB SFE PLE
1 Catechin 0.770 289.1659 15.78 1.12 6.40 1.93
2 Chlorogenic acid 0.779 353.1818 0.29 1.56 13.52 16.28
3 Ferulic acid 0.802 193.0495 1.66 1.84 4.41 6.90
4 Gallic acid * 3.693 169.1064 0.10 0.14 1.97 0.15
5 Synrigic acid 3.806 197.9050 38.65 8.44 11.85 25.04
6 Myricetin-3-O-glucoside * 4.295 479.1749 2.25 0.84 2.87 5.20
7 p-Coumaric acid 4.343 163.1147 0.46 1.85 0.29 0.93
8 Rutin hydrate 4.642 609.2362 1.07 39.40 9.25 9.22
9 Myricetin 5.515 317.1280 18.06 3.35 4.92 4.54
10 Quercetin 6.229 301.1333 7.51 1.56 2.61 2.25
11 Kaempferol 7.311 285.1339 7.08 1.51 3.15 4.05
Others 7.09 38.39 38.75 23.50

LEA-M: Leaching extraction of manually husked bean coat, LEA-WB: Leaching extraction of whole black bean, SFE: Supercritical fluid extraction, PLE: Pressurized liquid extraction. Results are expressed as percentages of the total area, representing the relative abundance of one specific peak related to the sum of the areas of all peaks in the chromatogram for each extraction method. −: non-identified compounds, the percentages were summed and related to the sum of all peaks in the chromatogram. m/z values are related to negative ionization. Compounds with * symbol were identified only with m/z values, while compounds without the symbol were identified with m/z values and pure standards.