Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;9(5):649. doi: 10.3390/foods9050649

Table 3.

Effects of different aging methods and aging time on the shear force and texture profile analysis (TPA) of beef.

Trait Aging Time (d) Aging Methods 1 SE 3 p-Values 2
Wet Aging 350 5000 7900 11,000 Dry Aging Time Method Time
×
Method
Shear Force
(N)
0 81.13 ax 4 76.42 az 68.08 ax 76.62 ax 79.36 ax 81.62 ax 2.58 <0.001 0.199 0.006
7 29.82 bcy 43.56 ay 35.81 aby 30.71 bcy 32.86 bcy 25.70 cy
14 33.84 ay 31.59 ax 33.84 ay 27.66 aby 29.04 ay 22.79 by
Hardness 0 13,885.00 ax 15,676.31 ax 14,344.76 ax 15,036.12 ax 14,462.26 ax 15,988.77 ax 203 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
7 14,489.43 ax 14,006.18 ax 13,497.55 ax 10,995.27 by 11,386.99 by 11,136.72 by
14 13,711.00 abx 14,911.28 ax 14,359.48 ax 11,657.09 by 11,386.99 by 9133.81 cz
Springiness 0 0.464 ay 0.463 ax 0.442 ay 0.465 ay 0.479 ax 0.475 ax 0.01 0.001 0.468 0.667
7 0.518 ax 0.482 ax 0.518 ax 0.503 axy 0.499 ax 0.507 ax
14 0.475 axy 0.470 ax 0.476 axy 0.514 ax 0.502 ax 0.495 ax
Cohesiveness 0 0.519 axy 0.493 ax 0.480 ay 0.519 ax 0.503 ax 0.517 ax 0.01 <0.001 0.056 0.003
7 0.533 ax 0.490 abx 0.530 ax 0.484 by 0.490 bx 0.484 bx
14 0.487 ay 0.481 ax 0.506 axy 0.478 ay 0.481 ax 0.441 by
Chewiness 0 3145.06 ax 3768.84 ax 3181.66 ax 3703.85 ax 3646.82 ax 3947.95 ax 74.1 <0.001 0.08 0.003
7 3878.69 ax 3333.02 abx 3809.51 ax 2582.78 by 2859.62 by 2729.91 by
14 3022.42 abx 3222.11 abx 3456.25 ax 2825.88 by 2760.79 by 2035.61 cy

1 Under aging methods, 350, 5000, 7900, and 11,000 mean the transmission of water vapor of four different moisture-permeable packagings, respectively; 2 p-values after columns indicate the level of significance including aging time, aging methods, and their interaction; 3 SE: standard error; 4 a~d within the same row indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) between aging methods, x~z within the same column indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) between aging time.