Table 6.
Comparison of the present method with other methods.
| Detection Method | Sample Preparation Method | Analyte | Animal-Derived Food | Analysis Time (min) |
LOD (μg/kg) |
LOQ (μg/kg) |
Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPLC-FLD [16] | SPE | Spectinomycin | Swine, calf and chicken plasma | 12.0 | - | - | 91.0–104 |
| HPLC-UVD [18] | CSMISPE | Lincomycin | Milk | 9.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 80.0–89.0 |
| HILIC-MS/MS [22] | LLE | Spectinomycin | Feedstuffs | 10.0 | - | - | 80.0–92.0 |
| HPLC-MS [23] | SPE | Lincomycin | Honey | 10.0 | 7.0 | 10.0 | 102–105 |
| HPLC-MS/MS [24] | LLE | Lincomycin | Animal tissues and milk | 10.0 | 1.5–8.8 | 25.0–50.0 | 93.9–107 |
| HPLC-MS/MS [27] | ASE | Lincomycin | Meat and milk | 40.0 | 5.0–10.0 | 10.0–15.0 | 86.0–91.0 |
| GC-NPD [30] | ASE | Spectinomycin Lincomycin |
Animal tissues | 13.0 | 8.1–9.4 | 16.4–21.4 | 73.0–97.0 |
| GC-MS [30] | ASE | Spectinomycin Lincomycin |
Animal tissues | 15.0 | 1.9–3.1 | 4.7–5.7 | 70.0–93.0 |
| GC-MS/MS | ASE | Spectinomycin Lincomycin |
Poultry eggs | 10.8 | 2.3–4.3 | 5.6–9.5 | 80.0–95.7 |
Note: “-” Not reported. FLD, fluorescence detection; UVD, ultraviolet detection; NPD, nitrogen phosphorus detection; CSMISPE, core-shell molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction.