Table 1. Quality assessment of the included studies through the QUADAS-2 tool.
Risk of Bias | Applicability Concerns | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Patient selection | Index test | Reference standards | Flow & timing | Total risk of bias | Patient selection | Index test | Reference standards | Total applicability concerns |
Almukhtar et al., PLoS One (2014) |
☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ |
Bazina et al., Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (2018) |
☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ |
Cevidanes et al., Dentomaxillofac Radiol (2005) |
? | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ? | ? | ☺ | ☺ | ? |
Cevidanes et al., Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (2009) |
☹ | ☺ | ? | ☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☺ | ? | ☹ |
Gkantidis et al., PLoS One (2015 |
☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | ☹ |
Ghoneima et al., Orthod Craniofac Res (2017) |
☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ |
Häner et al., Orthod Craniofac Res (2019) |
? | ? | ? | ☺ | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Koerich et al., Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2016) |
☺ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☺ | ☹ | ☹ |
Koerich et al., Angle Orthod (2017) |
? | ☺ | ☹ | ? | ☹ | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ |
Lemieux et al., Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (2014) |
? | ☹ | ☹ | ? | ☹ | ? | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ |
Nada et al., PLoS One (2011) |
☺ | ☹ | ? | ☺ | ☹ | ? | ☹ | ☺ | ☹ |
Nguyen et al., Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (2017) |
☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ |
Ruellas et al., Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (2016a) |
☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ |
Ruellas et al., PLoS One (2016b) |
☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ? | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ |
Weissheimer et al., Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2015) |
☹ | ☹ | ? | ☺ | ☹ | ☹ | ☹ | ? | ☹ |
Notes.
low risk of bias/low applicability concerns.
high risk of bias/high applicability concerns.
unclear risk of bias/unclear applicability concerns.