Table 2.

Results of pairwise comparisons between the studied breeds using Bonferroni test with respect to BW and R1R2avg

Breed	Chihuahuas	Yorkshire terriers	Pomeranians	Toy poodles	Miniature pinschers	Shih tzus	Italian greyhounds	Miniature dachshunds	Miniature schnauzers	French bulldogs	Beagles	Shiba inus	Welsh corgis	Shetland sheepdogs	Labrador retrievers	Golden retrievers
Chihuahuas	–
Yorkshire terriers		–
Pomeranians			–
Toy poodles				–
Miniature pinschers					–
Shih tzus	◎	◎	◎	◎	●	–
Italian greyhounds	◎	○	●	◎		●	–
Miniature dachshunds	◎	◎	◎	◎	●			–
Miniature schnauzers	◎	○	◎	◎		○	○		–
French bulldogs	◎	◎	◎	◎	◎	○	◎	◎	●	–
Beagles	◎	◎	◎	◎	◎	○	◎	◎			–
Shiba inus	◎	○	◎	◎	○	◎	○	◎		●	●	–
Welsh corgis	◎	◎	◎	◎	◎	○	○	○		●		●	–
Shetland sheepdogs	○	○	◎	○	○	◎	○	◎		●	●		●	–
Labrador retrievers	◎	◎	◎	◎	◎	○	◎	◎	◎	○	○	◎	◎	◎	–
Golden retrievers	◎	◎	◎	◎	◎	○	◎	◎	◎	○	◎	◎	◎	◎		–

Breeds are listed in order of increasing mean BW.

Breed pairs with statistically significant differences in either or both variables are shown.

◎ = P<0.05 in both BW and R1R2avg; ○ =P<0.05 in BW only (no significant differences in R1R2avg); ◎, P<0.05 in both BW and R1R2avg.

BW, bodyweight; R1, radius of the minor meridian; R2, radius of the major meridian; R1R2avg, mean of R1 and R2.