Table 2.
Endline data availability and patient sample sizes by HealthRise site and for intervention and comparison patients
| Data collection | Brazil | India | South africa | Minnesota, United States | ||||
| Teófilo otoni | Vitória da conquista | Shimla | Pixley ka seme | uMgungundlovu | Hennepin county | Ramsey county | Rice county | |
| HealthRise (intervention) | ||||||||
| Quantitative | Baseline, endline | Baseline, endline | Endline | Endline | Endline | Baseline, endline | Baseline, endline | Baseline, endline |
| Total patients (interviewed or enrolled)* | 4210 | 2610 | 277 | 62 | 88 | 121 | 78 | 217 |
| Health facilities for patient interviews | – | – | 18 | 7 | 7 | – | – | – |
| Total patients enrolled at endline | – | – | – | – | – | 104 | 53 | 217 |
| Patients with hypertension | 3992 | 2443 | 224 | 45 | 74 | 82 | 21 | 72 |
| Patients with hypertension and biometric data | 1169 | 1095 | 222 | 38 | 67 | 77 | 21 | 71 |
| Patients with diabetes | 1028 | 1052 | 110 | 38 | 42 | 76 | 46 | 120 |
| Patients with diabetes and biometric data | 176 | 68 | 110 | 37 | 38 | 60 | 41 | 92 |
| Qualitative | ||||||||
| Total interviews and focus groups | 22 | 15 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Patient focus groups | 5 | 4 | 5 | – | 4 | – | – | – |
| Community health workers (CHWs) and frontline health workers† | 10 | 7 | 3 | – | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Facility-based or clinic-based providers | – | – | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Facility or clinic managers and administrators | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Policy-makers | 2 | 1 | – | – | – | 3 | ||
| Other‡ | – | – | 4 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Comparison | ||||||||
| Quantitative | – | – | Endline | Endline | Endline | Baseline, endline | Baseline, endline | Baseline, endline |
| Total patients (interviewed or enrolled)* | – | – | 230 | 123 | 149 | – | – | – |
| Health facilities for patient interviews | – | – | 12 | 12 | 14 | – | – | – |
| Total patients enrolled at endline | – | – | – | – | – | 107 | 99 | 311 |
| Patients with hypertension | – | – | 165 | 107 | 125 | 84 | 58 | 178 |
| Patients with hypertension and biometric data | – | – | 160 | 91 | 122 | 84 | 58 | 172 |
| Patients with diabetes | – | – | 109 | 62 | 76 | 28 | 77 | 303 |
| Patients with diabetes and biometric data | – | – | 109 | 62 | 73 | 13 | 71 | 296 |
| Qualitative | – | – | – | |||||
| Total interviews and focus groups | 12 | 8 | 13 | 7 | 11 | – | – | – |
| Patient focus groups | 3 | 2 | 4 | – | 2 | – | – | – |
| CHWs and frontline health workers† | 6 | 4 | 3 | – | 6 | – | – | – |
| Facility-based or clinic-based providers | – | – | 3 | 3 | – | – | – | – |
| Facility or clinic managers and administrators | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | – | – | – |
| Policy-makers | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Other | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total patients for Shimla, India and South Africa reflect patients surveyed at facilities as part of the endline evaluation, and not those formally enrolled in HealthRise. Patients with hypertension or diabetes and biometric data for Brazil and US sites are prevalent cases of hypertension or diabetes and had at least two biometric measure.
*For Shimla and South Africa sites, total patients are those surveyed at facilities as part of endline evaluation data collection, not those enrolled in HealthRise.
†For Shimla, household-based health workers (eg, ASHAs and outreach workers) were included in the CHW and front-line healthworker category.
‡For Shimla, other included HealthRise master trainers and a HealthRise grantee official from MAMTA.
ASHAs, accredited social health activists.