Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;177(13):3036–3045. doi: 10.1111/bph.15032

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Effect of PDE inhibitors on the inotropic potency of isoprenaline in electrically stimulated (1.5–2.0 Hz) hiPSC‐CM EHTs, expressed as LogEC50 for isoprenaline of data shown in Figure 4. Scatter plot of raw data with mixed model‐estimated marginal means and 95% confidence intervals; P < .05, significantly different from vehicle control (VC); pairwise comparisons (sequentially step‐down rejective Bonferroni‐adjusted). VC: DMSO 0.1%, n = 45; 6); Mil: milrinone (10 μM, n = 17; 3); Cil: cilostamide (300 nM, n = 22; 3); Rol: rolipram (10 μM, n = 10; 2); Tad: tadalafil (10 nM, n = 10; 2); IBMX (10 μM, n = 15; 3), n; n = number of EHTs; number of differentiation batches, the number of EHTs were used for statistics. F test results (F values with dfmean;dferror in brackets) with P value for the effect of condition: P condition (VC, Mil, Cil, Rol, Tad, IBMX) < .001 (F[5;113] = 9.744). F test results were calculated from the adjusted data set. See Section 2 for further information on data analytical procedures