Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 8;7:42. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00257-3

Table 1.

Comparison of UKA using PSI versus using conventional instrumentation for tibial resections

PSI (n = 25) Conventional (n = 22)
mean ± SD
n (%)
(min–max) mean ± SD
n (%)
(min–max) p value
Patient demographics
 Age (years) 65.1 ± 9.2 (46–86) 70.5 ± 9.2 (52–85) 0.050
 BMI (kg/m2) 27.3 ± 2.9 (21.3–32.2) 26.4 ± 3.6 (21–33) 0.365
 Women 6 (24%) 15 (68%) 0.002
 Right knee 15 (60%) 12 (55%) 0.709
Intraoperative measurements
 Tourniquet time (min) 58 ± 6 (45–75) 58 ± 9 (50–90) 0.55
Coronal alignment
 HKA angle (deg)
  Preoperative 173.8 ± 2.9 (167–178) 173.6 ± 3.0 (169–181) 0.844
  Postoperative 176.3 ± 2.8 (170–183) 177.1 ± 2.3 (171–181) 0.298
Net change 2.5 ± 1.5 (−1–5) 3.4 ± 2.4 (−4–6) 0.114
 mMPTA (deg)
  Preoperative 83.1 ± 2.0 (80–87) 84.7 ± 2.0 (81–88) 0.012
  Postoperative 85.6 ± 2.1 (80–89) 85.0 ± 3.6 (78–92) 0.509
Net change 2.4 ± 2.6 (−2–7) 0.3 ± 4.1 (−7–7) 0.045

Abbreviations: PSI patient specific instruments, BMI body mass index, HKA hip-knee-ankle, mMPTA mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, min minutes, deg degrees