Skip to main content
editorial
. 2020 May 25;53(7):1171–1181. doi: 10.1002/eat.23303

TABLE 3.

ANOVA test results by gender

Gender
Total sample Male Female
Variable N M (SD) Median N M (SD) Median N M (SD) Median F (df) p Cohen's d
Amount of research shutdown a 184 2.45 (1.62) 3 42 2.60 1.59 2.5 139 2.40 1.63 3 0.46 (1,179) .501 0.12
Concerns
Staffing 186 3.73 (3.15) 3 43 4.91 2.88 5 140 3.37 3.12 3 8.27 (1,181) .004 0.50
Budget 186 3.73 (2.97) 3 43 4.14 2.95 4 140 3.60 2.94 3 1.11 (1,181) .294 0.18
Data collection 187 6.22 (2.99) 6 43 6.02 2.53 6 141 6.33 3.00 7 0.38 (1,182) .540 0.11
Recruitment 186 6.15 (3.17) 7 43 6.26 2.92 7 140 6.08 3.25 6.5 0.10 (1,181) .749 0.06
Institutional approval 185 2.87 (2.95) 2 43 3.58 3.21 3 139 2.64 2.78 2 3.49 (1,180) .063 0.33
Supply procurement 184 2.49 (2.82) 2 42 3.33 3.28 2 139 2.26 2.64 1 4.75 (1,179) .031 0.39
Future funding 182 6.48 (2.85) 7 42 5.98 2.72 6.5 138 6.62 2.88 7 1.63 (1,178) .203 0.23
Impact on career 157 4.92 (3.42) 5 35 3.14 3.36 1 119 5.45 3.25 6 13.3 (1,152) <.001 0.71
Stress level 183 6.70 (2.22) 7 43 6.19 2.59 5 137 6.88 2.08 7 3.18 (1,178) .076 0.31

Note: Aside from the item asking about “Amount of research shutdown” (see below), all other items were rated on a 10‐point scale from 0 (no concern/no stress) to 10 (extreme concern/extreme stress).

Abbreviations: M, mean; SD, standard deviation.

a

The “Amount of research shutdown” item was coded on a 6‐point scale as follows: 1 = 0% of research shutdown; 2 = up to 20% of research shutdown; 3 = up to 40% of research shutdown; 4 = up to 60% of research shutdown; 5 = up to 80% of research shut down; 6 = up to 100% of research shutdown.