TABLE 4.
Statements identified by open‐ended questions. |
Please share your 1–3 most effective strategies for dealing with COVID‐19 in terms of your eating disorders research . (222 comments) |
1. Employ technology‐based solutions (96/222, 42.3%) |
Attending online conferences or webinar programs; creating a platform for virtual convening to share information or provide support; using crowd‐sourcing for participant recruitment; switching to remote design implementation. |
2. Goal adjustments for one's work overall or for specific projects (81/222, 35.5%) |
Prioritizing tasks that can be done remotely; adjusting study goals; writing more review papers; focusing on analysis of data already collected by the respondent or of data created by others; brainstorming ideas for future projects. |
3. Practicing acceptance of disruption (33/222, 14.9%) |
Focusing on what is feasible rather than dwelling on what is impossible; accepting the inevitability of reduced productivity; letting go of self‐imposed expectations. |
4. Building the respondents' or their team's capacity (15/222. 6.8%) |
Learning new skills related to use of online technologies; reassigning staff; inviting colleagues to the team who cannot continue their own research but have time to work on data analysis and manuscript preparation. |
Please share your 1–3 most effective strategies for transitioning your eating disorders research to online settings . (Respondents were instructed to skip the question if they had not made such a transition.) (142 comments) |
1. Employ technology‐based solutions (80/142, 56.3%) |
Using apps (e.g., Venmo to pay participants, facetime for collecting weight data); holding meetings via zoom or Webex; conducting survey research via Qualtrics. |
2. Preparing key individuals for task shifting and using technology tools (15/142, 10.6%,) |
Using screen sharing to teach participants how to collect their own data at home; forming study groups for the research team to learn use of technology tools; shifting data collection task from research team to others (e.g., teachers). |
3. Employing effective and frequent communication (13/142, 9.2%) |
Recognizing the need for clear communication because your audience may experience information overload; holding frequent staff meetings to make sure everyone feels informed and connected; keeping in touch with participants to reduce study drop‐outs. |
Please describe 1–3 changes you expect to make in your research practices as a result of COVID‐19 . (respondents were instructed to skip the question if they did not anticipate making changes or had checked “it's too soon to tell”). (94 comments) |
1. Moving their research to (or maintaining it on) to online platforms or preparing accordingly (60/94, 64%) |
Exploring online interventions; collecting all data online; training research staff in online procedures. |
2. Altering ongoing studies or changing research direction altogether (20/94, 21%) |
Increasing focus on qualitative research; reducing the emphasis on imaging studies; contemplating a career change. |
Please describe 1–3 changes the eating disorders research community should make to support research during and after COVID‐19 . (151 comments) |
1. Encouraging research collaboration (49/151, 32.5%) |
Jointly recruiting participants; employing open science practices (e.g., sharing methods); sharing advice about best practices. |
2. Undertaking advocacy efforts (29/151, 19.2%) |
Raising awareness that eating disorders receive insufficient resources for research and interventions; advocating for research funding of COVID‐19 related work; advocating funds to support students. |
3. Setting and acting upon positive social norms (26/151, 17.2%) |
Encouraging and supporting others, especially early‐career scholars; being aware of challenges colleagues may be encountering; practicing kindness; giving others a break. |
4. Utilizing technology (19/151, 12.5%) |
Holding conferences online; conducting webinars for professional development; increasing online research. |
Is there a question about COVID‐19 's impact on your eating disorders research that we should have asked but didn't? (42 comments) |
1. We should have asked about high‐risk researchers (18/42, 42.9%) |
Distractions due to childcare responsibilities; potential differential impact of family responsibilities as a career detriment for women; missing out on learning opportunities via informal encounters that typically happen in the workplace; disruptions threatening students' opportunities for graduate school stipends; disruptions diminishing the educational opportunities for students currently on internship; worries about a bad job market for graduates. |