Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;12(5):1258. doi: 10.3390/nu12051258

Table 3.

The odds of being overweight or obese (versus underweight or normal weight) with the consumption of 100% FJ in individuals reporting the consumption of 100% FJ in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2013–2014): Results of multiple logistic regression models.

Children (2 to 19 y) Adults (20 y+)
With Energy Included in the Model Without Energy Included in the model With Energy Included in the Model Without Energy Included in the model
Variable OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Amount of 100% FJ Consumed
(per 102 g/d)
1.04
(0.92, 1.17)
0.55 1.02
(0.91, 1.15)
0.68 0.95
(0.84, 1.07)
0.35 0.94
(0.84, 1.06)
0.30
Age
(per 101 years)
1.54
(0.91, 2.59)
0.10 1.03
(0.98, 1.09)
0.21 1.17
(1.01, 1.36)
0.04 1.02
(1.00, 1.03)
0.03
Gender
(male versus female)
1.34
(9.85, 2.12)
0.19 1.27
(0.85, 1.89)
0.23 1.48
(1.02, 2.14)
0.04 1.42
(1.00, 2.02)
0.051
Race
(non-Hispanic white versus others)
0.69
(0.50, 0.95)
0.02 0.68
(0.50, 0.93)
0.02 0.95
(0.59, 1.51)
0.80 0.94
(0.59, 1.48)
0.77
Ratio of family income to poverty 0.90
(0.78, 1.05)
0.18 0.91
(0.78, 1.06)
0.19 0.91
(0.81, 1.01)
0.08 0.90
(0.81, 1.01)
0.08
Energy
(per 103 kcal/d)
0.85
(0.57, 1.27)
0.40 NA NA 0.93
(0.76, 1.12)
0.41 NA NA

CI = confidence intervals; FJ = fruit juice; NA = not applicable; NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; OR = odds ratio; U.S. = United States; y = years; Bolded values were statistically significant.