Table 1.
References | Paper type and case number | Area of urology | Application | Reported outcomes and limitations | Cost and time to produce model |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wake et al. (2) | Case series (n = 127) | Prostate Cancer and Renal Cancer | Radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy | Improved 5-point Likert scale survey on understanding of disease and surgical procedure Patients were counseled twice if using a 3D adjunct |
Not reported |
Schmit et al. (10) | Pilot study (n = 25) | Renal Cancer | Renal cryoablation | No significant improvement in patient anatomical or procedural knowledge compared to control High perceived value by patients |
$400 40 h |
Teishima et al. (9) | Case series (n = 29) | Renal cancer | Partial nephrectomy | Improved understanding of anatomy and tumor relationships for patient and family. Procedure understanding improved only in patient. |
Not reported |
Atalay et al. (8) | Pilot study (n = 5) | Renal stones | PCNL | Improved questionnaire scores on understanding of kidney anatomy, stone position and surgical procedure No control group. Duplicated explanation with 3D-model |
$100 2 h |
Bernard et al. (7) | Pilot study (n = 7) | Renal cancer | Partial nephrectomy | Improved questionnaire-assessed understanding of physiology, anatomy, tumor characteristics and planned surgical procedure No control group. Duplicated explanation with 3D-model |
$560 |