Table 3.
Univariate analyses of the factors associated with resilience (N=587).
| Variable | Category | Mean (SD) | t/F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | t=5.167 | 0.000 | ||
| Male | 69.51 (17.10) | |||
| Female | 62.30 (16.69) | |||
| Marital status | F=0.034 | 0.966 | ||
| Unmarried | 65.52 (16.39) | |||
| Marriage | 65.86 (17.58) | |||
| Divorced | 64.88 (15.84) | |||
| Education | F=1.369 | 0.255 | ||
| Below the undergraduate | 64.49 (17.92) | |||
| Undergraduate | 65.73 (17.38) | |||
| Master and above | 68.84 (14.64) | |||
| Job category | F=3.647 | 0.027 | ||
| Nurse | 62.16 (18.21) | |||
| Technician | 67.33 (17.77) | |||
| Doctor | 65.97 (15.91) | |||
| Contact with confirmed/suspected cases at work | t=0.217 | 0.828 | ||
| Yes | 65.96 (16.95) | |||
| No | 65.64 (17.46) | |||
| The participant with symptoms | t=−3.125 | 0.002 | ||
| Yes | 56.85 (14.58) | |||
| No | 66.31 (17.27) | |||
| Family members with symptoms | t=−0.552 | 0.581 | ||
| Yes | 64.04 (18.22) | |||
| No | 65.85 (17.22) | |||
| Knowledge of COVID-19 | F=20.534 | 0.001 | ||
| Lack of understanding | 49.43 (12.63) | |||
| Part of understanding | 60.31 (16.41) | |||
| Very understanding | 68.95 (16.91) | |||
| Knowledge of COVID-19 protective measures | t=−6.284 | 0.001 | ||
| Part of understanding | 58.95 (16.10) | |||
| Very understanding | 68.52 (16.96) | |||
| Availability of adequate protective materials | F=3.247 | 0.022 | ||
| Very shortage | 65.39 (19.21) | |||
| Partial shortage | 64.64 (15.85) | |||
| Partial abundance | 64.46 (17.29) | |||
| Very abundance | 70.30 (18.20) | |||
| Knowledge of the psychological hotline | t=3.044 | 0.002 | ||
| Yes | 67.26 (17.36) | |||
| No | 62.68 (16.67) | |||
| Whether the participant was concerned about contact with suspected/confirmed cases at work | t=−2.292 | 0.022 | ||
| Yes | 64.40 (16.94) | |||
| No | 67.71 (17.55) | |||
| Whether the participant was concerned about work-related infections | t=−2.737 | 0.006 | ||
| Yes | 64.12 (16.59) | |||
| No | 68.05 (17.92) |